|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
How does the Lamprey Central Nervous System make the Lamprey Swim?
1 Department of Physiology III, Karolinska Institutet Lidingövägen 1, S-114 33 Stockholm, Sweden
The lamprey spinal cord, in isolation or with the brainstem, can be used in vitro. The motor patterns underlying the swimming movements can be elicited by: (1) a pharmacological activation of a specific type of neuronal receptor (NMDA-receptor), that may in other systems give rise to an unstable membrane potential, (2) by stimulation of the brainstem or (3) by tactile activation of skin regions left innervated. In the latter case the initiation of ‘fictive’ swimming is partially caused by a release of a transmitter activating NMDA-receptors, as judged by the effect of NMDA-receptor blockers. The central pattern generator (CPG) is strongly influenced by feedback from mechanosensitive elements, which at least partially reside within the spinal cord. The edge cell in the lamprey spinal cord serves as an intraspinal mechanoreceptor.
The ability to generate a coordinated motor output is distributed, since spinal cord sections down to 1.5–2 segments can be made to generate alternating activity. Motor neurones receive an approximately synchronous alternating excitatory and inhibitory drive in each swim cycle and do not appear to be part of the CPG. Motor neurones supplying different parts of the body wall on the same side of a body segment have different morphology with ramifications around different descending axons. The input drive signal during fictive locomotion to motor neurones located close to each other but with different morphological characteristics may differ substantially with regard to the 
-relationship (±25%) and the shape of the oscillation. This implies that even at a segmental level motor neurones may be further subdivided, and furthermore that the ipsilateral network generating the drive signal to ipsilateral motor neurones generates a more complex and individualized output than previously assumed. Motor neurones are not part of the rhythm-generating circuit. The large identifiable interneurones are not required for rhythmic activity to occur although they may be phasically active in the swim cycle. The small segmental interneurones have not yet been completely characterized. Many are phasically active during ‘fictive locomotion’ and lack an apparent axon. Their phase relationships in relation to the burst patterns vary over the entire swim cycle.
Key words: Lamprey, fictive locomotion, feedback
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. Saitoh, A. Menard, and S. Grillner Tectal Control of Locomotion, Steering, and Eye Movements in Lamprey J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 3093 - 3108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. C. Liao Neuromuscular control of trout swimming in a vortex street: implications for energy economy during the Karman gait J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2004; 207(20): 3495 - 3506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. G. Drucker and G. V. Lauder Experimental Hydrodynamics of Fish Locomotion: Functional Insights from Wake Visualization Integr. Comp. Biol., April 1, 2002; 42(2): 243 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. D. McClellan and A. Hagevik Descending Control of Turning Locomotor Activity in Larval Lamprey: Neurophysiology and Computer Modeling J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1997; 78(1): 214 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S Grillner Neurobiological bases of rhythmic motor acts in vertebrates Science, April 12, 1985; 228(4696): 143 - 149. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
