spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BENNET-CLARK, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by BENNET-CLARK, H. C.
Journal of Experimental Biology 128,383-409 (1987)
Published by Company of Biologists 1987


The Tuned Singing Burrow of Mole Crickets

H. C. BENNET-CLARK 1

1 Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS

During burrow digging by the mole cricket Scapteriscus acletus Rehn and Hubbard, the burrow is enlarged and shaped in a series of digging cycles, each lasting 1-2min, and song chirps are produced after every cycle. The song becomes up to 18 dB louder and acoustically purer during burrow building. The shape of the song pulse envelope changes so that its average power density becomes greater and its build-up and decay become more gradual.

The forewings show a single resonance of the harp (Cu 1 cell) regions at 2.5-3.0 kHz: the normal song carrier frequency is 2.5-2.7kHz. Removal of the outer parts of the forewings does not affect the radiated sound power.

The singing burrow has an exponential horn opening at the soil surface and an internal bulb. The calculated cut-off frequency of the horn is 1-34 kHz and that of the first resonance is 2.5-2.7 kHz. The volume of the bulb is close to that required to tune the throat: obliteration of the burrow bulb causes a substantial decrease in the radiated sound pressure levels before singing ceases.

The horn mouth acts as a finite sound source, with large acoustic reactance. The acoustics of the burrow were measured with a small doublet source inserted at the position at which the cricket sings. At this position, the burrow resonates at 2.75-3 kHz, with a quality factor (Q), measured both by the - 3 dB bandwidth and by the build-up and decay of tone bursts, of 2.5-2.7. The sound pressure produced by the doublet source is up to 24 dB louder when it is in the burrow than when it is in free air. Further in or out from the insect's singing position, the effective gain of the burrow is reduced and other resonances and anti-resonances are observed. Obliteration of the burrow bulb reduces the effective gain of the burrow by 6-10 dB and the burrow ceases to resonate at 2.75 kHz.

It is proposed that the tuned burrow acts as a resistive load on the vibrating harps, so allowing good coupling between the small wings and the surrounding medium while allowing a pure carrier frequency to be radiated.

Key words: Scapteriscus, song, acoustics

Accepted on November 21, 1986




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
F. Montealegre-Z, J. F. C. Windmill, G. K. Morris, and D. Robert
Mechanical phase shifters for coherent acoustic radiation in the stridulating wings of crickets: the plectrum mechanism
J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2009; 212(2): 257 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
D. R. Howard, A. C. Mason, and P. S. M. Hill
Hearing and spatial behavior in Gryllotalpa major Saussure (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae)
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2008; 211(22): 3613 - 3618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
G. D. McNett and R. B. Cocroft
Host shifts favor vibrational signal divergence in Enchenopa binotata treehoppers
Behav. Ecol., February 24, 2008; (2008) arn017v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. N. Prestwich and K. O'Sullivan
Simultaneous measurement of metabolic and acoustic power and the efficiency of sound production in two mole cricket species (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae)
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2005; 208(8): 1495 - 1512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
F. Montealegre-Z and A. C. Mason
The mechanics of sound production in Panacanthus pallicornis (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Conocephalinae): the stridulatory motor patterns
J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2005; 208(7): 1219 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
V. C. K. Couldridge and M. J. van Staaden
Habitat-dependent transmission of male advertisement calls in bladder grasshoppers (Orthoptera; Pneumoridae)
J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2004; 207(16): 2777 - 2786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
H. C. Bennet-Clark
Wing resonances in the Australian field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus
J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2003; 206(9): 1479 - 1496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
W. J. BAILEY, H. C. BENNET-CLARK, and N. H. FLETCHER
ACOUSTICS OF A SMALL AUSTRALIAN BURROWING CRICKET: THE CONTROL OF LOW-FREQUENCY PURE-TONE SONGS
J. Exp. Biol., March 10, 2002; 204(16): 2827 - 2841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
H. C. Bennet-Clark and W. J. Bailey
Ticking of the clockwork cricket: the role of the escapement mechanism
J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2002; 205(5): 613 - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. Prestwich, K. Lenihan, and D. Martin
The control of carrier frequency in cricket calls: a refutation of the subalar-tegminal resonance/auditory feedback model
J. Exp. Biol., January 2, 2000; 203(3): 585 - 596.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
H. Bennet-Clark
Resonators in insect sound production: how insects produce loud pure-tone songs
J. Exp. Biol., January 12, 1999; 202(23): 3347 - 3357.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Dantzker, G. Deane, and J. Bradbury
Directional acoustic radiation in the strut display of male sage grouse Centrocercus urophasianus
J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 1999; 202(21): 2893 - 2909.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1987