spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HARPER, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by BLAKE, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by HARPER, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by BLAKE, R. W.
Journal of Experimental Biology 155,175-192 (1991)
Published by Company of Biologists 1991


Prey Capture and the Fast-Start Performance of Northern Pike Esox Lucius

DAVID G. HARPER 1 and ROBERT W. BLAKE 1

1 Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 2A9, Canada

Fast-start performance of northern pike Esox lucius (mean length, 0.38m) during prey capture was measured with subcutaneously implanted accelerometers. Acceleration-time plots and simultaneous high-speed ciné films reveal four behaviours with characteristic kinematics and mechanics. The fast-start types are identified by the number of large peaks that appear in the acceleration-time and velocity-time data.

Comparisons of mean performance were made between each type of feeding fast-start. Type I fast-starts were of significantly shorter duration (0.084 s) and displacement (0.132 m) than type III (0.148 s and 0.235 m) and type IV (0.189 s and 0.306 m) behaviours, and higher mean and maximum acceleration (38.6 and 130.3 ms-2, respectively) than type II (26.6 and 95.8 ms-2), type III (22.0 and 91.2 ms-2) and type IV (18.0 and 66.6 m s-2) behaviours. The type II behaviours were of shorter duration (0.115 s) and displacement (0.173 m) and of higher mean acceleration than type IV fast-starts, and were also of significantly shorter duration than type III behaviours.

Prey-capture performance was compared to escapes by the same individuals. When data are combined, regardless of mechanical type, mean acceleration (37.6 vs25.5ms-2), maximum acceleration (120.2 vs 95.9ms-2), mean velocity (1.90 vs 1.57 ms-1) and maximum velocity (3.97 vs 3.09 ms-1) were found to be larger and duration shorter (0.108 vs 0.133 s) during escapes than during prey capture. No differences were found through independent comparisons of the performance of feeding and escape types II and III, but type I escapes had significantly higher mean velocity (2.27 vs 1.58 ms-1), maximum velocity (4.70 vs 3.12 ms-1) and mean acceleration (54.7 vs 38.6 ms-2) than type II feeding behaviours.

Prey-capture performance was also related to prey size, apparent prey size (defined as the angular size of the prey on the pike's retina) and strike distance (the distance from the pike to the prey at the onset of the fast-start). Mean and maximum acceleration increased with apparent size and decreased with strike distance, while the duration of the event increased with strike distance and decreased with apparent size. No relationship was found between the actual prey size and any performance parameter.

Strike distance ranged from 0.087 to 0.439 m and decreased as the apparent size increased from 2.6 to 9.9° (r2=0.75). The type I behaviour was usually employed when the strike distance was small and the prey appeared large. As strike distance increased and apparent size decreased, there was a progressive selection of type II, then III and then IV behaviours.

Key words: fast-starts, prey capture, accelerometry, Esox lucius

Accepted on July 11, 1990




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
W. H. Liden and J. Herberholz
Behavioral and neural responses of juvenile crayfish to moving shadows
J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2008; 211(9): 1355 - 1361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
T. E. Higham
The integration of locomotion and prey capture in vertebrates: Morphology, behavior, and performance
Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 82 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. Wohl and S. Schuster
The predictive start of hunting archer fish: a flexible and precise motor pattern performed with the kinematics of an escape C-start
J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2007; 210(2): 311 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. A. Weiss, S. J. Zottoli, S. C. Do, D. S. Faber, and T. Preuss
Correlation of C-start behaviors with neural activity recorded from the hindbrain in free-swimming goldfish (Carassius auratus)
J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2006; 209(23): 4788 - 4801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
H. E. Karlsen, R. W. Piddington, P. S. Enger, and O. Sand
Infrasound initiates directional fast-start escape responses in juvenile roach Rutilus rutilus
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2004; 207(24): 4185 - 4193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
P. Domenici, E. M. Standen, and R. P. Levine
Escape manoeuvres in the spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias)
J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2004; 207(13): 2339 - 2349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. E. Schriefer and M. E. Hale
Strikes and startles of northern pike (Esox lucius): a comparison of muscle activity and kinematics between S-start behaviors
J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2004; 207(3): 535 - 544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. E. Hale
S- and C-start escape responses of the muskellunge (Esox masquinongy) require alternative neuromotor mechanisms
J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2002; 205(14): 2005 - 2016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1991