spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WEBB, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by SCHULTZ, W. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by WEBB, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by SCHULTZ, W. W.
Journal of Experimental Biology 155,219-226 (1991)
Published by Company of Biologists 1991


The Effects of an Air/Water Surface on the Fast-Start Performance of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss)

PAUL W. WEBB 1, DOMINIQUE SIMS 2, and WILLIAM W. SCHULTZ 3

1 Department of Biology and School of Natural Resources, The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
2 Department of Biology, The University of Michigan MI 48109, USA
3 Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Michigan MI 48109, USA

Fast-start performance of rainbow trout (mass 0.187±0.022kg; mean±2S.E., N= 10) was measured in water of various depths. Relative water depth was defined as z/B, where z is the water depth measured from the air/water surface to the longitudinal midline of the body and B is the span of the caudal fin, 0.062±0.004m. Relative water depths (at absolute depths) tested were; 0.31 (at 0.05m), 1.11 (at 0.1m), 1.92 (at 0.15m), 2.73 (at 0.2m) and 7.56 (at 0.5m). Performance was defined in terms of the motion of the centre of mass as measured by the turning radius and the cumulative distance travelled in a given elapsed time. Turning radius was not affected by water depth and averaged 0.018±0.003m. Distance travelled was a positive function of water depth, although paired t-tests showed no significant effect of depth at 0.15 and 0.2 m after about 70 ms. Energy dispersion due to the formation of surface waves increased with decreasing relative water depth. The largest energy dispersion in wave formation at a relative water depth of 0.31 averaged about 70% of the useful mechanical work performed in deep water. Energy dispersion in wave generation was negligible for relative water depths larger than approximately 3. Energy dispersion is similar to that for rigid streamlined bodies moving at constant speed

Key words: air/water surface, fast-start, trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss

Accepted on August 22, 1990




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. W. Blake and K. H. S. Chan
Swimming in the upside down catfish Synodontis nigriventris: it matters which way is up
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2007; 210(17): 2979 - 2989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. Wohl and S. Schuster
The predictive start of hunting archer fish: a flexible and precise motor pattern performed with the kinematics of an escape C-start
J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2007; 210(2): 311 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. Bejan and J. H. Marden
Unifying constructal theory for scale effects in running, swimming and flying
J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2006; 209(2): 238 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
F. Fish and R. Baudinette
Energetics of locomotion by the Australian water rat (Hydromys chrysogaster): a comparison of swimming and running in a semi-aquatic mammal
J. Exp. Biol., January 2, 1999; 202(4): 353 - 363.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1991