spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ELLIOTT, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by ANDREW, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by ELLIOTT, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by ANDREW, T.
Journal of Experimental Biology 157,391-408 (1991)
Published by Company of Biologists 1991


TEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF SNAIL FEEDING RHYTHMS: A THREE-PHASE RELAXATION OSCILLATOR

C. J. ELLIOTT 1 and T. ANDREW 1

1 Department of Biology, University of York Heslington, York, YO1 5DD, UK

1. Rhythmic fictive feeding was recorded from the motoneurones of the buccal ganglia of Lymnaea stagnalis. The times of the action potentials were recorded by microcomputer and the lengths of the three phases (Nl, N2 and N3) making up each feeding cycle were determined.

2. During spontaneous rhythmic fictive feeding in Lymnaea stagnalis the cycle period varied randomly.

3. Most of the variation in cycle period arose from alterations in the duration of the N3 (swallowing) phase of the rhythm; the Nl (protraction) and N2 (rasp) phases were fixed in length.

4. The firing rates of feeding motoneurones active in the Nl and N3 phases increased with feeding rate: this was not true of those active in the N2 phase.

5. In rhythms produced by stimulating the SO modulatory interneurone, both the Nl and N3 phases varied in duration. The N2 duration remained constant.

6. The temporal analysis is accounted for by the neuronal model based on the synaptic interactions recorded by Elliott and Benjamin (1985a,b; J. Neurophysiol. 54, 1396–1421).

Note:
Present address: The Institute of Psychiatry, 101 Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF.

Key words: mollusc, feeding, rhythms, Lymnaea stagnalis

Accepted on January 17, 1991




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
V. A. Straub, K. Staras, G. Kemenes, and P. R. Benjamin
Endogenous and Network Properties of Lymnaea Feeding Central Pattern Generator Interneurons
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 1569 - 1583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
C. J. H. Elliott and A. J. Susswein
Comparative neuroethology of feeding control in molluscs
J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2002; 205(7): 877 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Vehovszky and C. J. H. Elliott
Activation and Reconfiguration of Fictive Feeding by the OctopamineContaining Modulatory OC Interneurons in the Snail Lymnaea
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2001; 86(2): 792 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
G. Kemenes, K. Staras, and P. R. Benjamin
Multiple Types of Control by Identified Interneurons in a Sensory-Activated Rhythmic Motor Pattern
J. Neurosci., April 15, 2001; 21(8): 2903 - 2911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. F. Jansen, A. W. Pieneman, and A. ter Maat
Behavior-Dependent Activities of a Central Pattern Generator in Freely Behaving Lymnaea stagnalis
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1997; 78(6): 3415 - 3427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1991