QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by WAINWRIGHT, P. C. Articles by BENNETT, A. F. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by WAINWRIGHT, P. C. Articles by BENNETT, A. F.

Journal of Experimental Biology 159,109-133 (1991)
Published by Company of Biologists 1991

Kinematics of Tongue Projection in Chamaeleo Oustaleti

PETER C. WAINWRIGHT ¹, DAVID M. KRAKLAU ¹, and ALBERT F. BENNETT ¹

¹ Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, CA 92717, USA

The kinematics of prey capture by the chamaeleonid lizard Chamaeleo oustaleti were studied using high-speed cinematography. Three feeding sequences from each of two individuals were analyzed for strike distances of 20 and 35 cm, at 30°C. Ten distances and angles were measured from sequential frames beginning approximately 0.5 s prior to tongue projection and continuing for about 1.0 s. Sixteen additional variables, documenting maximum excursions and the timing of events, were calculated from the kinematic profiles. Quantified descriptions of head, hyoid and tongue movements are presented. Previously unrecognized rapid protraction of the hyobranchial skeleton simultaneously with the onset of tongue projection was documented and it is proposed that this assists the accelerator muscle in powering tongue projection. Acceleration of the tongue occurred in about 20ms, reaching a maximum acceleration of 486 m s^-2 and maximum velocity of 5.8m s^-1 in 35 cm strikes. Deceleration of the tongue usually began within 5 ms before prey contract and the direction of tongue movement was reversed within 10 ms of prey contact. Retraction of the tongue, caused by shortening of the retractor muscles, reached a maximum velocity of 2.99 ms^-1 and was complete 330 ms after prey contact. Projection distance influences many aspects of prey capture kinematics, particularly projection time, tongue retraction time and the extent of gape and head movements during tongue retraction, all of which are smaller in shorter feedings. Though several features of the chameleon strike have apparently been retained from lizards not capable of ballistic tongue projection, key differences are documented. Unlike members of a related family, the Agamidae, C. oustaleti uses no body lunge during prey capture, exhibits gape reduction during tongue projection and strongly depresses the head and jaws during tongue retraction.

Note:

Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.

Key words: chameleon, prey capture behavior, tongue projection, feeding mechanism, kinematics, Chamaeleo oustaleti

Accepted on April 22, 1991

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Schaerlaeken, A. Herrel, and J. J. Meyers Modulation, individual variation and the role of lingual sensory afferents in the control of prey transport in the lizard Pogona vitticeps J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 211(13): 2071 - 2078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Higham The integration of locomotion and prey capture in vertebrates: Morphology, behavior, and performance Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 82 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Deban, J. C. O'Reilly, U. Dicke, and J. L. van Leeuwen Extremely high-power tongue projection in plethodontid salamanders J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2007; 210(4): 655 - 667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Janovetz Functional morphology of feeding in the scale-eating specialist Catoprion mento J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2005; 208(24): 4757 - 4768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Herrel, J. J. Meyers, J.-P. Timmermans, and K. C. Nishikawa Supercontracting muscle: producing tension over extreme muscle lengths J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2002; 205(15): 2167 - 2173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Herrel, J. J. Meyers, P. Aerts, and K. C. Nishikawa Functional implications of supercontracting muscle in the chameleon tongue retractors J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 2001; 204(21): 3621 - 3627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Herrel, J. Meyers, P Aerts, and K. Nishikawa The mechanics of prey prehension in chameleons J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 2000; 203(21): 3255 - 3263. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V Delheusy and V. Bels Feeding kinematics of phelsuma madagascariensis (Reptilia: gekkonidae): testing differences between iguania and scleroglossa J. Exp. Biol., January 12, 1999; 202(24): 3715 - 3730. [Abstract] [PDF]