QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by DEAN, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by DEAN, J.

Journal of Experimental Biology 159,449-471 (1991)
Published by Company of Biologists 1991

Effect of Load on Leg Movement and Step Coordination of the Stick Insect Carausius Morosus

JEFFREY DEAN ¹

¹ Abteilung für Biokybernetik und Theoretische Biologie, Fakultät für Biologie, Universität Bielefeld, Postfach 8640, D-4800 Bielefeld 1, FRG

A treadwheel mounted on a torque motor was used to study changes in step coordination as a function of the magnitude and direction of external forces resisting and assisting leg retraction. The apparent contradiction in the literature concerning the shift in the posterior extreme point is shown to depend upon the magnitude of the load. External forces resisting leg retraction generally shift step end-points rostrally and those assisting leg retraction shift them caudally, shifting leg movement so that the active muscles can provide greater force. However, this primary trend reverses for external forces equivalent to or less than the weight of the body. Together, these results indicate that the decision to end stance does not simply depend upon the leg's loading but rather on its efficiency in contributing propulsion. As expected, loads resisting leg retraction decrease retraction speed and increase step period. They also decrease protraction speed, increase swing duration and shift phase relationships of adjacent ipsilateral legs away from alternation towards a metachronal pattern. Moderate to large assisting loads evoke similar changes: they increase swing duration less but shift the phase of middle and rear legs more than the corresponding resisting loads. Thus, by itself, a reduction in the force required during retraction does not transform the gait from metachronal to tripod. The mean phase of contralateral leg pairs is unaffected by load: these legs continue to alternate.

Key words: insect locomotion, walking, load compensation, leg coordination, Carausius morosus

Accepted on May 28, 1991

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Matheson and V. Durr Load compensation in targeted limb movements of an insect J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2003; 206(18): 3175 - 3186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Diederich, M. Schumm, and H. Cruse Stick Insects Walking Along Inclined Surfaces Integr. Comp. Biol., February 1, 2002; 42(1): 165 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Duysens, F. Clarac, and H. Cruse Load-Regulating Mechanisms in Gait and Posture: Comparative Aspects Physiol Rev, January 1, 2000; 80(1): 83 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Cruse, Ch. Bartling, M. Dreifert, J. Schmitz, D.E. Brunn, J. Dean, and T. Kindermann Walking: A Complex Behavior Controlled by Simple Networks Adaptive Behavior, March 1, 1995; 3(4): 385 - 418. [Abstract] [PDF]

				U. Muller- Wilm, H. Cruse, J. Eltze, J. Dean, H.-J. Weidemann, and F. Pfeiffer Kinematic Model of a Stick Insect as an Example of a Six-Legged Walking System Adaptive Behavior, September 1, 1992; 1(2): 155 - 169. [Abstract] [PDF]