spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matheson, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matheson, T.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 200, Issue 1 93-100, Copyright © 1997 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Hindleg targeting during scratching in the locust

T Matheson

Intact locusts (Schistocerca gregaria) respond to tactile stimulation of their folded wings with rhythmic scratching movements of the ipsilateral hindleg that are directed towards the site of stimulation. For example, sites near the base of a wing elicit anteriorly directed scratches, whereas sites near the distal end of a wing elicit posteriorly directed scratches. Locusts also scratch in response to tactile stimulation of a wing that is held outstretched in a posture similar to that normally adopted during flight, but they fail to alter their leg targeting to compensate for this changed position of the stimulus site. Instead, they scratch at an empty point in space near the abdomen, where the stimulus site would have been if the wing was folded in the resting posture. This inappropriate scratching does not result from mechanical constraints on the hindleg's movement, from stimulation of abdominal sensory receptors, or from an absence of sensory information from the outstretched wing. It also persists when the metathoracic ganglion that controls movements of the hindlegs is isolated from the remainder of the central nervous system (CNS). Targeted scratching of sites on the wings of locusts therefore appears to be fixed relative to body coordinates and does not take into account alterations of the target wing's position.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. L. Page, J. Zakotnik, V. Durr, and T. Matheson
Motor Control of Aimed Limb Movements in an Insect
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 484 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Zakotnik, T. Matheson, and V. Durr
Co-contraction and passive forces facilitate load compensation of aimed limb movements.
J. Neurosci., May 10, 2006; 26(19): 4995 - 5007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. L. Page and T. Matheson
Wing hair sensilla underlying aimed hindleg scratching of the locust
J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2004; 207(15): 2691 - 2703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
T. Matheson and V. Durr
Load compensation in targeted limb movements of an insect
J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2003; 206(18): 3175 - 3186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
V. Durr and T. Matheson
Graded Limb Targeting in an Insect Is Caused by the Shift of a Single Movement Pattern
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1754 - 1765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
T. Hiraguchi, T. Yamaguchi, and M. Takahata
Mechanoreceptors involved in the hindwing-evoked escape behaviour in cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus
J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2003; 206(3): 523 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1997