|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 200, Issue 4 837-847, Copyright © 1997 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
C Pelz, B Gerber and R Menzel
Institut fur Neurobiologie, Freie Universitat Berlin, Germany.
Stimulus intensity is an important determinant for perception, learning and behaviour. We studied the effects of odorant concentration on classical conditioning involving odorants and odorant-mechanosensory compounds using the proboscis-extension reflex in the honeybee. Our results show that high concentrations of odorant (a) support better discrimination in a feature-positive task using rewarded odorant-mechanosensory compounds versus unrewarded mechanosensory stimuli, (b) have a stronger capacity to overshadow learning of a simultaneously trained mechanosensory stimulus, and (c) induce better memory consolidation. Furthermore, honeybees were trained discriminatively to two different concentrations of one odorant. Honeybees are not able to solve this task when presented with rewarded low versus unrewarded high concentrations. Taken together, our results suggest that high concentrations of odorant support stronger associations (are more 'salient') than low concentrations. Our results, however, do not indicate that honeybees can treat two different concentrations of one odorant as qualitatively different stimuli. These findings fill a gap in what is known about honeybee olfactory learning and are a first step in relating behaviour to recent advances in the physiological analysis of coding for odorant concentration in honeybees.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Balkenius, A. Kelber, and C. Balkenius How Do Hawkmoths Learn Multimodal Stimuli? A Comparison of Three Models Adaptive Behavior, December 1, 2008; 16(6): 349 - 360. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Masek and M. Heisenberg Distinct memories of odor intensity and quality in Drosophila PNAS, October 14, 2008; 105(41): 15985 - 15990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. C. Daly, L. A. Carrell, and E. Mwilaria Characterizing Psychophysical Measures of Discrimination Thresholds and the Effects of Concentration on Discrimination Learning in the Moth Manduca sexta Chem Senses, January 1, 2008; 33(1): 95 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Gil and R. J. De Marco Olfactory learning by means of trophallaxis in Apis mellifera J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2005; 208(4): 671 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. T. Skiri, M. Stranden, J. C. Sandoz, R. Menzel, and H. Mustaparta Associative learning of plant odorants activating the same or different receptor neurones in the moth Heliothis virescens J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2005; 208(4): 787 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Giurfa and D. Malun Associative Mechanosensory Conditioning of the Proboscis Extension Reflex in Honeybees Learn. Mem., May 1, 2004; 11(3): 294 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. M. Heiling, K. Cheng, and M. E. Herberstein Exploitation of floral signals by crab spiders (Thomisus spectabilis, Thomisidae) Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2004; 15(2): 321 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. A. Wright and B. H. Smith Different Thresholds for Detection and Discrimination of Odors in the Honey bee (Apis mellifera) Chem Senses, February 1, 2004; 29(2): 127 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Ditzen, J.-F. Evers, and C. G. Galizia Odor Similarity Does Not Influence the Time Needed for Odor Processing Chem Senses, November 1, 2003; 28(9): 781 - 789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Tautz, S. Maier, C. Groh, W. Rossler, and A. Brockmann Behavioral performance in adult honey bees is influenced by the temperature experienced during their pupal development PNAS, June 10, 2003; 100(12): 7343 - 7347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Deisig, H. Lachnit, J.-C. Sandoz, K. Lober, and M. Giurfa A Modified Version of the Unique Cue Theory Accounts for Olfactory Compound Processing in Honeybees Learn. Mem., May 1, 2003; 10(3): 199 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Deisig, H. Lachnit, and M. Giurfa The Effect of Similarity between Elemental Stimuli and Compounds in Olfactory Patterning Discriminations Learn. Mem., May 1, 2002; 9(3): 112 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. BREMBS and M. HEISENBERG CONDITIONING WITH COMPOUND STIMULI IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER IN THE FLIGHT SIMULATOR J. Exp. Biol., March 10, 2002; 204(16): 2849 - 2859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. U. Fried, S. H. Fuss, and S. I. Korsching Selective imaging of presynaptic activity in the mouse olfactory bulb shows concentration and structure dependence of odor responses in identified glomeruli PNAS, February 14, 2002; (2002) 52658399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Belluscio and L. C. Katz Symmetry, Stereotypy, and Topography of Odorant Representations in Mouse Olfactory Bulbs J. Neurosci., March 15, 2001; 21(6): 2113 - 2122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Muller, B Gerber, F Hellstern, M Hammer, and R Menzel Sensory preconditioning in honeybees J. Exp. Biol., January 4, 2000; 203(8): 1351 - 1364. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B Gerber and J Ullrich No evidence for olfactory blocking in honeybee classical conditioning J. Exp. Biol., January 7, 1999; 202(13): 1839 - 1854. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. U. Fried, S. H. Fuss, and S. I. Korsching Selective imaging of presynaptic activity in the mouse olfactory bulb shows concentration and structure dependence of odor responses in identified glomeruli PNAS, March 5, 2002; 99(5): 3222 - 3227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
