spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonser, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bonser, R. H.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 202, Issue 11 1459-1463, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Branching out in locomotion: the mechanics of perch use in birds and primates

RH Bonser
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK. richard.bonser@bbsrc.ac.uk

Many animals use thin perches, such as the branches of trees, as locomotory substrates. In this paper, I have reviewed the literature concerned with measurements of locomotory forces made by birds and primates on thin and flexible substrates. Through a knowledge of the locomotory forces exerted by animals when using different substrates, the mechanical cost of their use can be established. We are just beginning to learn about the magnitude and patterns of force production in various branch-using vertebrates, primarily as a result of the development of instrumented perches. Instrumented perches have been designed to measure the forces produced by birds and primates when leaping from rigid and flexible horizontal and flexible vertical perches, and also from instrumented handgrips during brachiation. The development of these techniques for birds and primates allows us to compare the way in which they use perches as locomotory substrates. In both birds and primates, the magnitudes of landing forces are smaller than those during take-off. Two explanations have been proposed; the difference is either a consequence of perch compliance or it is a strategic decision to be cautious of 'new' perches. Leaps from flexible perches may be somewhat inefficient because considerable energy is dissipated in bending the perch, and this energy may remain unrecovered when the animal leaves contact with the perch.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. E. Paskins, A. Bowyer, W. M. Megill, and J. S. Scheibe
Take-off and landing forces and the evolution of controlled gliding in northern flying squirrels Glaucomys sabrinus
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2007; 210(8): 1413 - 1423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
B. Vanhooydonck, A. Herrel, and D. J. Irschick
Out on a limb: the differential effect of substrate diameter on acceleration capacity in Anolis lizards
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2006; 209(22): 4515 - 4523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
E. E. Vereecke, K. D'Aout, and P. Aerts
The dynamics of hylobatid bipedalism: evidence for an energy-saving mechanism?
J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2006; 209(15): 2829 - 2838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1999