|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 202, Issue 13 1725-1739, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
BW Tobalske, WL Peacock and KP Dial
Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA. btobalske@oeb.harvard.edu.
It has been proposed elsewhere that flap-bounding, an intermittent flight style consisting of flapping phases interspersed with flexed-wing bounds, should offer no savings in average mechanical power relative to continuous flapping unless a bird flies 1.2 times faster than its maximum range speed (Vmr). Why do some species use intermittent bounds at speeds slower than 1.2Vmr? The 'fixed-gear hypothesis' suggests that flap-bounding is used to vary mean power output in small birds that are otherwise constrained by muscle physiology and wing anatomy to use a fixed muscle shortening velocity and pattern of wing motion at all flight speeds; the 'body-lift hypothesis' suggests that some weight support during bounds could make flap-bounding flight aerodynamically advantageous in comparison with continuous flapping over most forward flight speeds. To test these predictions, we studied high-speed film recordings (300 Hz) of wing and body motion in zebra finches (Taenopygia guttata, mean mass 13.2 g, N=4) taken as the birds flew in a variable-speed wind tunnel (0-14 m s-1). The zebra finches used flap-bounding flight at all speeds, so their flight style was unique compared with that of birds that facultatively shift from continuous flapping or flap-gliding at slow speeds to flap-bounding at fast speeds. There was a significant effect of flight speed on all measured aspects of wing motion except percentage of the wingbeat spent in downstroke. Changes in angular velocity of the wing indicated that contractile velocity in the pectoralis muscle changed with flight speed, which is not consistent with the fixed-gear hypothesis. Although variation in stroke-plane angle relative to the body, pronation angle of the wing and wing span at mid-upstroke showed that the zebra finch changed within-wingbeat geometries according to speed, a vortex-ring gait with a feathered upstroke appeared to be the only gait used during flapping. In contrast, two small species that use continuous flapping during slow flight (0-4 m s-1) either change wingbeat gait according to flight speed or exhibit more variation in stroke-plane and pronation angles relative to the body. Differences in kinematics among species appear to be related to wing design (aspect ratio, skeletal proportions) rather than to pectoralis muscle fiber composition, indicating that the fixed-gear hypothesis should perhaps be modified to exclude muscle physiology and to emphasize constraints due to wing anatomy. Body lift was produced during bounds at speeds from 4 to 14 m s-1. Maximum body lift was 0.0206 N (15.9 % of body weight) at 10 m s-1; body lift:drag ratio declined with increasing air speed. The aerodynamic function of bounds differed with increasing speed from an emphasis on lift production (4-10 m s-1) to an emphasis on drag reduction with a slight loss in lift (12 and 14 m s-1). From a mathematical model of aerodynamic costs, it appeared that flap-bounding offered the zebra finch an aerodynamic advantage relative to continuous flapping at moderate and fast flight speeds (6-14 m s-1), with body lift augmenting any savings offered solely by flap-bounding at speeds faster than 7.1 m s-1. The percentage of time spent flapping during an intermittent flight cycle decreased with increasing speed, so the mechanical cost of transport was likely to be lowest at faster flight speeds (10-14 m s-1).
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. W. Tobalske and A. A. Biewener Contractile properties of the pigeon supracoracoideus during different modes of flight J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 170 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Ellerby and G. N. Askew Modulation of flight muscle power output in budgerigars Melopsittacus undulatus and zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata: in vitro muscle performance J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2007; 210(21): 3780 - 3788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. W. Tobalske Biomechanics of bird flight J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2007; 210(18): 3135 - 3146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. W. Tobalske, D. R. Warrick, C. J. Clark, D. R. Powers, T. L. Hedrick, G. A. Hyder, and A. A. Biewener Three-dimensional kinematics of hummingbird flight J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 210(13): 2368 - 2382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. W. Tobalske, L. A. Puccinelli, and D. C. Sheridan Contractile activity of the pectoralis in the zebra finch according to mode and velocity of flap-bounding flight J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2005; 208(15): 2895 - 2901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Watanuki, A. Takahashi, F. Daunt, S. Wanless, M. Harris, K. Sato, and Y. Naito Regulation of stroke and glide in a foot-propelled avian diver J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2005; 208(12): 2207 - 2216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Hambly, E. J. Harper, and J. R. Speakman The energetic cost of variations in wing span and wing asymmetry in the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2004; 207(22): 3977 - 3984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. W. Tobalske, D. L. Altshuler, and D. R. Powers Take-off mechanics in hummingbirds (Trochilidae) J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2004; 207(8): 1345 - 1352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Liechti and L. Bruderer Wingbeat frequency of barn swallows and house martins: a comparison between free flight and wind tunnel experiments J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2002; 205(16): 2461 - 2467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Girard, M. W. McAleer, J. S. Rhodes, and T. Garland Jr. Selection for high voluntary wheel-running increases speed and intermittency in house mice (Mus domesticus) J. Exp. Biol., March 14, 2002; 204(24): 4311 - 4320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. W. Tobalske Morphology, Velocity, and Intermittent Flight in Birds Integr. Comp. Biol., April 1, 2001; 41(2): 177 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. V. Rayner, P. W. Viscardi, S. Ward, and J. R. Speakman Aerodynamics and Energetics of Intermittent Flight in Birds Integr. Comp. Biol., April 1, 2001; 41(2): 188 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. J. Pennycuick Speeds and wingbeat frequencies of migrating birds compared with calculated benchmarks J. Exp. Biol., January 10, 2001; 204(19): 3283 - 3294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. J. Park, M. Rosen, and A. Hedenstrom Flight kinematics of the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica) over a wide range of speeds in a wind tunnel J. Exp. Biol., January 8, 2001; 204(15): 2741 - 2750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Hedenstrom and F Liechti Field estimates of body drag coefficient on the basis of dives in passerine birds J. Exp. Biol., January 3, 2001; 204(6): 1167 - 1175. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. H. Dickinson, C. T. Farley, R. J. Full, M. A. Koehl, R. Kram, and S. Lehman How Animals Move: An Integrative View Science, April 7, 2000; 288(5463): 100 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Tobalske and K. Dial Effects of body size on take-off flight performance in the Phasianidae (Aves) J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 2000; 203(21): 3319 - 3332. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
