|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 202, Issue 23 3449-3461, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
JM Rayner
School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK. j.m.v.rayner@leeds.ac.uk
The power required for flight in any flying animal is a function of flight speed. The power curve that describes this function has become an icon of studies of flight mechanics and physiology because it encapsulates the accessible animal's flight performance. The mechanical or aerodynamic power curve, describing the increase in kinetic energy of the air due to the passage of the bird, is necessarily U-shaped, for aerodynamic reasons, and can be estimated adequately by lifting-line theory. Predictions from this and related models agree well with measured mechanical work in flight and with results from flow visualization experiments. The total or metabolic power curve also includes energy released by the animal as heat, and is more variable in shape. These curves may be J-shaped for smaller birds and bats, but are difficult to predict theoretically owing to uncertainty about internal physiological processes and the efficiency of the flight muscles. The limitations of some existing models aiming to predict metabolic power curves are considered. The metabolic power curve can be measured for birds or bats flying in wind tunnels at controlled speeds. Simultaneous determination in European starlings Sturnus vulgaris of oxygen uptake, total metabolic rate (using labelled isotopes), aerodynamic power output and heat released (using digital video thermography) enable power curves to be determined with confidence; flight muscle efficiency is surprisingly low (averaging 15-18 %) and increases moderately with flight speed, so that the metabolic power curve is shallower than predicted by models. Accurate knowledge of the power curve is essential since extensive predictions of flight behaviour have been based upon it. The hypothesis that the power curve may not in fact exist, in the sense that the cost of flight may not be perceived by a bird as a continuous smooth function of air speed, is advanced but has not yet formally been tested. This hypothesis is considered together with evidence from variation in flight behaviour, wingbeat kinematics and flight gait with speed. Possible constraints on flight behaviour can be modelled by the power curves: these include the effect of a maximum power output and a constraint on maximum speed determined by downstroke wingbeat geometry and the relationship between thrust and lift.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. P. Larkin and R. E. Szafoni Evidence for widely dispersed birds migrating together at night Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 48(1): 40 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. M. Berg and A. A. Biewener Kinematics and power requirements of ascending and descending flight in the pigeon (Columba livia) J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2008; 211(7): 1120 - 1130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Ellerby and G. N. Askew Modulation of flight muscle power output in budgerigars Melopsittacus undulatus and zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata: in vitro muscle performance J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2007; 210(21): 3780 - 3788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Ellerby and G. N. Askew Modulation of pectoralis muscle function in budgerigars Melopsitaccus undulatus and zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata in response to changing flight speed J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2007; 210(21): 3789 - 3797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. A. Jones, K. S. Lucey, and D. J. Ellerby Efficiency of labriform swimming in the bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2007; 210(19): 3422 - 3429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. W. Tobalske Biomechanics of bird flight J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2007; 210(18): 3135 - 3146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. W. Bundle, K. S. Hansen, and K. P. Dial Does the metabolic rate-flight speed relationship vary among geometrically similar birds of different mass? J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2007; 210(6): 1075 - 1083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. M. Bishop Circulatory variables and the flight performance of birds J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2005; 208(9): 1695 - 1708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Hambly, E. J. Harper, and J. R. Speakman The energy cost of loaded flight is substantially lower than expected due to alterations in flight kinematics J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2004; 207(22): 3969 - 3976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Hambly, E. J. Harper, and J. R. Speakman The energetic cost of variations in wing span and wing asymmetry in the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2004; 207(22): 3977 - 3984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Liechti and L. Bruderer Wingbeat frequency of barn swallows and house martins: a comparison between free flight and wind tunnel experiments J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2002; 205(16): 2461 - 2467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. L. Nudds and D. M. Bryant Consequences of load carrying by birds during short flights are found to be behavioral and not energetic Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2002; 283(1): R249 - R256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. W. Tobalske Morphology, Velocity, and Intermittent Flight in Birds Integr. Comp. Biol., April 1, 2001; 41(2): 177 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. V. Rayner, P. W. Viscardi, S. Ward, and J. R. Speakman Aerodynamics and Energetics of Intermittent Flight in Birds Integr. Comp. Biol., April 1, 2001; 41(2): 188 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. N. Askew, R. L. Marsh, and C. P. Ellington The mechanical power output of the flight muscles of blue-breasted quail (Coturnix chinensis) during take-off J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 2001; 204(21): 3601 - 3619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Ward, U. Moller, J. M. V. Rayner, D. M. Jackson, D. Bilo, W. Nachtigall, and J. R. Speakman Metabolic power, mechanical power and efficiency during wind tunnel flight by the European starling Sturnus vulgaris J. Exp. Biol., January 10, 2001; 204(19): 3311 - 3322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. J. Park, M. Rosen, and A. Hedenstrom Flight kinematics of the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica) over a wide range of speeds in a wind tunnel J. Exp. Biol., January 8, 2001; 204(15): 2741 - 2750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L Bruderer, F Liechti, and D Bilo Flexibility in flight behaviour of barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) and house martins (Delichon urbica) tested in a wind tunnel J. Exp. Biol., January 4, 2001; 204(8): 1473 - 1484. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Tucker Gliding flight: drag and torque of a hawk and a falcon with straight and turned heads, and a lower value for the parasite drag coefficient J. Exp. Biol., January 12, 2000; 203(24): 3733 - 3744. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
