spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hennessey, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hennessey, T. M.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 202, Issue 4 407-416, Copyright © 1999 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

ATP reception and chemosensory adaptation in Tetrahymena thermophila

MY Kim, HG Kuruvilla, S Raghu and TM Hennessey
Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA and Department of Science and Mathematics, Cedarville College, PO Box 601, Cedarville, OH 45314, USA. Thennes@acsu.buffalo.edu

Micromolar concentrations of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and its non-hydrolyzable analog &bgr;- &ggr; -methylene ATP are both effective depolarizing chemorepellents in Tetrahymena thermophila. Chemorepellent behavior consists of repeated bouts of backward swimming (avoidance reactions) that can easily be quantified to provide a convenient bioassay for purinergic reception studies. Chemosensory adaptation occurs following prolonged exposure (10 min) to the repellents, and cells regain normal swimming behavior. Adaptation is specific since cells that are behaviorally adapted to either ATP or &bgr;- &ggr; -methylene ATP still retain full responsiveness to the chemorepellents GTP and lysozyme. However, cross adaptation occurs between ATP and &bgr;- &ggr; -methylene ATP, suggesting that they involve the same receptor. Behavioral sensitivity to both ATP and &bgr;- &ggr; -methylene ATP is increased by the addition of Na+, but addition of either Ca2+ or Mg2+ dramatically decreases the response to ATP. These ionic effects are correlated with in vivo ATP hydrolysis, suggesting that divalent ions decrease purinergic sensitivity by activating a Ca2+- or Mg2+-dependent ecto-ATPase to hydrolyze the ATP signal. In vivo [32P]ATP binding studies and Scatchard analysis suggest that the behavioral adaptation is due to a decrease in the number of surface binding sites, as represented by decreased Bmax values. All these changes are reversible (de-adaptation) after 12 min in a repellent-free buffer. Electrophysiological analysis showed that both &bgr;- &ggr; -methylene ATP (10 micromol l-1) and ATP (500 micromol l-1) elicited sustained, reversible depolarizations while GTP (10 micromol l-1) produced a transient depolarization, suggesting that the chemosensory response pathways for ATP and GTP reception may differ. There may be separate ATP and GTP receptors since ATP and GTP responses do not cross-adapt and 'cold' (unlabeled) GTP is not a good inhibitor of [32P]ATP binding. These results suggests that T. thermophila possess high-affinity surface receptors for ATP that are down-regulated during chemosensory adaptation. These ATP receptors may act as chemorepellent receptors to enable T. thermophila to recognize recently lysed cells and avoid a possibly deleterious situation. This is the simplest eukaryotic organism to show an electrophysiological response to external ATP.




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1999