QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Seyfarth, A. Articles by Van Leeuwen, J. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Seyfarth, A. Articles by Van Leeuwen, J. L.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 203, Issue 4 741-750, Copyright © 2000 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Optimum take-off techniques and muscle design for long jump

A Seyfarth, R Blickhan and JL Van Leeuwen
Institute for Sport Science, LSB Biomechanik, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Seidelstrasse 20, D-07749 Jena, Germany.

A two-segment model based on Alexander (1990; Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 329, 3-10) was used to investigate the action of knee extensor muscles during long jumps. A more realistic representation of the muscle and tendon properties than implemented previously was necessary to demonstrate the advantages of eccentric force enhancement and non-linear tendon properties. During the take-off phase of the long jump, highly stretched leg extensor muscles are able to generate the required vertical momentum. Thereby, serially arranged elastic structures may increase the duration of muscle lengthening and dissipative operation, resulting in an enhanced force generation of the muscle-tendon complex. To obtain maximum performance, athletes run at maximum speed and have a net loss in mechanical energy during the take-off phase. The positive work done by the concentrically operating muscle is clearly less than the work done by the surrounding system on the muscle during the eccentric phase. Jumping performance was insensitive to changes in tendon compliance and muscle speed, but was greatly influenced by muscle strength and eccentric force enhancement. In agreement with a variety of experimental jumping performances, the optimal jumping technique (angle of attack) was insensitive to the approach speed and to muscle properties (muscle mass, the ratio of muscle fibre to tendon cross-sectional area, relative length of fibres and tendon). The muscle properties also restrict the predicted range of the angle of the velocity vector at take-off.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Rummel and A. Seyfarth Stable Running with Segmented Legs The International Journal of Robotics Research, August 1, 2008; 27(8): 919 - 934. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Lucia, J. Olivan, F. Gomez-Gallego, C. Santiago, M. Montil, and C. Foster Citius and longius (faster and longer) with no {alpha}-actinin-3 in skeletal muscles? Br. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2007; 41(9): 616 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. P. McGowan, R. V. Baudinette, J. R. Usherwood, and A. A. Biewener The mechanics of jumping versus steady hopping in yellow-footed rock wallabies J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2005; 208(14): 2741 - 2751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Dutto, D. F. Hoyt, H. M. Clayton, E. A. Cogger, and S. J. Wickler Moments and power generated by the horse (Equus caballus) hind limb during jumping J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2004; 207(4): 667 - 674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. Lindstedt, T. E. Reich, P. Keim, and P. C. LaStayo Do muscles function as adaptable locomotor springs? J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2002; 205(15): 2211 - 2216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]