spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elias, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Reilly, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elias, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Reilly, S. M.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 203, Issue 4 791-801, Copyright © 2000 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Prey transport kinematics in Tupinambis teguixin and Varanus exanthematicus: conservation of feeding behavior in 'chemosensory-tongued' lizards

JA Elias, LD McBrayer and SM Reilly
Department of Biological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA.

Although lizards have been predicted to show extensive intraoral prey-processing behaviors, quantitative analyses of the types of prey-processing behavior they demonstrate and of their kinematics have been limited. The more basal lizard lineages (Iguanians) have undergone some study, but the prey-processing repertoires of crown taxa have not been thoroughly examined and quantitative comparisons of behaviors within or among species have not been made. In this study, the prey transport behavior of the savannah monitor (Varanus exanthematicus) and gold tegu (Tupinambis teguixin) are described. Although these two lineages have independently evolved tongues that are highly specialized for chemoreception, we found that they share the same three distinct types of transport behavior. These behavior patterns are (i) a purely inertial transport, (ii) an inertial transport with use of the tongue, and (iii) a non-inertial lingual transport. The tongue is used extensively in both the inertial and the purely lingual transport behaviors. More than 75 % of all transport behaviors involved tongue movements. These species appear to exhibit a conservation of feeding kinematics compared with patterns known for basal lizards. A hypothesis for the evolution of inertial feeding is proposed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. J. Clark and A. P. Summers
Morphology and kinematics of feeding in hagfish: possible functional advantages of jaws
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2007; 210(22): 3897 - 3909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
A. Herrel, J. J. Meyers, K. C. Nishikawa, and F. D. Vree
The Evolution of Feeding Motor Patterns in Lizards: Modulatory Complexity and Possible Constraints
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2001; 41(6): 1311 - 1320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
N. J. Kley
Prey Transport Mechanisms in Blindsnakes and the Evolution of Unilateral Feeding Systems in Snakes
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2001; 41(6): 1321 - 1337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
B. Moon
The mechanics of swallowing and the muscular control of diverse behaviours in gopher snakes
J. Exp. Biol., January 9, 2000; 203(17): 2589 - 2601.
[Abstract] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2000