QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online March 16, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 1139-1147 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02741

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Barbosa, A. Articles by Hanlon, R. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Barbosa, A. Articles by Hanlon, R. T.

Disruptive coloration in cuttlefish: a visual perception mechanism that regulates ontogenetic adjustment of skin patterning

Alexandra Barbosa^1,*, Lydia M. Mäthger¹, Charles Chubb², Christopher Florio¹, Chuan-Chin Chiao^1,3 and Roger T. Hanlon¹

¹ Marine Resources Center, Marine Biological Laboratory, 7 MBL Street, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA
² Department of Cognitive Sciences and Institute for Mathematical Behavioral Sciences, University of California at Irvine, USA
³ Department of Life Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, 30013, Taiwan

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: abarbosa{at}mbl.edu)

Accepted 29 January 2007

Among the changeable camouflage patterns of cuttlefish, disruptive patterning is shown in response to certain features of light objects in the visual background. However, whether animals show disruptive patterns is dependent not only on object size but also on their body size. Here, we tested whether cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) are able to match their disruptive body patterning with increasing size of background objects as they grow from hatchling to adult size (0.7 to 19.6 cm mantle length; factor of 28). Specifically, do cuttlefish have a single `visual sampling rule' that scales accurately during ontogeny?

For each of seven size classes of cuttlefish, we created black and white checkerboards whose check sizes corresponded to 4, 12, 40, 120, 400 and 1200% of the area of the cuttlefish's White square, which is a neurophysiologically controlled component of the skin. Disruptive body patterns were evoked when, regardless of animal size, the check size measured either 40 or 120% of the area of the cuttlefish's White square, thus demonstrating a remarkable ontogenetic conformity to a single visual sampling rule.

Cuttlefish have no known visual feedback loop with which to adjust their skin patterns. Since the area of a cuttlefish's White square skin component is a function of body size, our results indicate that cuttlefish are solving a visual scaling problem of camouflage presumably without visual confirmation of the size of their own skin component.

Key words: camouflage, Sepia officinalis, visual sensori-motor system, crypsis, chromatophore, cephalopod

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. J. Kelman, D. Osorio, and R. J. Baddeley A review of cuttlefish camouflage and object recognition and evidence for depth perception J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2008; 211(11): 1757 - 1763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Mathger, C.-C. Chiao, A. Barbosa, K. C. Buresch, S. Kaye, and R. T. Hanlon Disruptive coloration elicited on controlled natural substrates in cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2007; 210(15): 2657 - 2666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]