spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Online submission spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online May 2, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 1681-1689 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.016436
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lechner, W.
Right arrow Articles by Ladich, F.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lechner, W.
Right arrow Articles by Ladich, F.

Size matters: diversity in swimbladders and Weberian ossicles affects hearing in catfishes

Walter Lechner and Friedrich Ladich*

Department of Behavioural Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: friedrich.ladich{at}univie.ac.at)

Accepted 4 March 2008

Otophysine fish possess Weberian ossicles, which connect the swimbladder to the inner ear and improve hearing ability. There is a high diversity in the morphology of the swimbladder and Weberian apparatus in catfishes, which might affect hearing. We have examined these structures in representatives of six families with large, single bladders (Ariidae, Auchenipteridae, Heptapteridae, Malapteruridae, Mochokidae, Pseudopimelodidae) and five subfamilies from two families (Callichthyidae, Loricariidae) having small, paired, encapsulated bladders. We tested their hearing abilities utilizing the non-invasive auditory evoked potential recording technique. Species with single, non-encapsulated, free airbladders possess one, three or four ossicles, whereas species with encapsulated bladders possess one or two. The relative sizes of the bladders and ossicles were significantly smaller in the latter group. All species were able to detect sound stimuli between 50 Hz and 5 kHz. Interspecific differences in hearing sensitivity varied at most by 24 dB below 1 kHz, whilst this variation increased to more than 50 dB at higher frequencies. Catfishes with free bladders had lower thresholds above 1 kHz than those having encapsulated ones. The relative lengths of swimbladders and of ossicular chains were correlated with hearing sensitivity above 1 and 2 kHz, respectively. The number of ossicles affected hearing at 4 and 5 kHz. These results indicate that larger bladders and ossicles as well as higher ossicle numbers improve hearing ability at higher frequencies in catfishes. We furthermore assume that the tiny bladders have minimized their hydrostatic function but were not completely lost because of their auditory function.

Key words: auditory evoked potential (AEP), Weberian apparatus, Siluriformes


Related articles in JEB:

CATFISH PAY BUOYANCY PENALTY
Kathryn Phillips
JEB 2008 211: 0. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. Phillips
CATFISH PAY BUOYANCY PENALTY
J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2008; 211(10): ii - ii.
[Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008