spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online June 13, 2008
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 2079-2086 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.015081
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schack, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Madsen, P. T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schack, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Madsen, P. T.

The responses of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) to ultrasound-emitting predators: stress, behavioural changes or debilitation?

Henriette B. Schack1,*, Hans Malte1 and Peter T. Madsen1,2

1 Zoophysiology, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Aarhus, Bldn. 1131, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
2 Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA

* Author for correspondence (e-mail: henriette{at}post.au.dk)

Accepted 16 April 2008

A previous study has reported that Atlantic cod can be conditioned to detect ultrasonic sound pulses of high intensity. This capability has been proposed as a mean for detection and avoidance of echolocating toothed whales that emit intense ultrasonic clicks. In this study, we use acoustic playbacks to test the hypotheses that unconditioned cod can detect and respond to intense ultrasound from toothed whales and from echosounders. Intense ultrasound exposure of 210 dB re. 1µPa (pp) did not cause a short-term stress response in the form of bradycardia in unconditioned cod. Free-swimming cod exposed to ultrasonic clicks and echosounder pulses with received levels of more than 204 dB re. 1 µPa (pp) did not elicit flight responses as seen in ultrasound detecting Alosinae. Furthermore, we tested the debilitating effects of high intensity ultrasound on swimming cod with no detected changes in swimming ability when exposed to more than 213 dB re. 1 µPa (pp). It is concluded that intense ultrasound exposure induces neither an antipredator nor a stress response in Atlantic cod, and that echosounder pulses and biosonar clicks therefore most probably play no ecophysiological role in wild cod populations.







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008