spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ELLIS, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by ELLIS, P. E.
Journal of Experimental Biology 30,214-234 (1953)
Published by Company of Biologists 1953


The Gregarious Behaviour of Marching Locusta Migratoria Migratorioides (R. & F.) Hoppers

PEGGY E. ELLIS 1

1 The Department of Zoology and Comparative Anatomy, University College, London; and the Anti-locust Research Centre, London

1. The amount of marching by 4th-instar hoppers of Locusta migratoria migratorioides (R. & F.) which have been reared in crowds, was studied in relation to the total number of individuals and to the size of the cage.

2. Below 50 hoppers per cage, marching depended partly on the total number of hoppers present and partly on the number in relation to the area of the cage floor. Above 50 hoppers per cage, marching probably depended on the total number present, rather than the area of the cage floor.

3. In all cages, marching was greatly reduced with fewer than 30 hoppers, although even single individuals marched for part of the time.

4. An investigation of the hopper interactions which lead to an increase in marching activity in groups showed that the two most important were visual and mechanical ones.

5. Test hoppers followed moving hopper bodies alive or dead, but only gave a partial response to moving vertical stripes.

6. Mechanical interactions between hoppers greatly increased the proportion of reacting hoppers, but did not increase the distance travelled by the active individuals, beyond those travelled in response to optical stimuli alone.

7. Maximal marching activity, by the maximal proportion of hoppers in a band, depended on an opto-motor response to a moving background of hopper shapes and to the physical contact between hoppers.

8. Air and floor vibrations from other marching hoppers played only a small part in marching, whilst stimuli received via the antennae tended to inhibit marching when total activity was low.

9. The importance of the experimental results in explaining the behaviour of locust hoppers in the field was discussed.

Submitted on July 30, 1952




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. K. Parrish and L. Edelstein-Keshet
Complexity, Pattern, and Evolutionary Trade-Offs in Animal Aggregation
Science, April 2, 1999; 284(5411): 99 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1953