|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 63, Issue 1 273-293, Copyright © 1975 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
SP Thomas
The energetic cost of flight in a wind-tunnel was measured at various combinations of speed and flight angle from two species of bats whose body masses differ by almost an order of magnitude. The highest mean metabolic rate per unit body mass measured from P. hastatus (mean body mass, 0.093 kg) was 130.4 Wkg-1, and that for P. gouldii (mean body mass, 0.78 kg) was 69.6 Wkg-1. These highest metabolic rates, recorded from flying bats, are essentially the same as those predicted for flying birds of the same body masses, but are from 2.5 to 3.0 times greater than the highest metabolic rates of which similar-size exercising terrestrial mammals appear capable. The lowest mean rate of energy utilization per unit body mass P. hastatus required to sustain level flight was 94.2 Wkg-1 and that for P. gouldii was 53.4 Wkg-1. These data from flying bats together with comparable data for flying birds all fall along a straight line when plotted on double logarithmic coordinates as a function of body mass. Such data show that even the lowest metabolic requirements of bats and birds during level flight are about twice the highest metabolic capabilities of similar-size terrestrial mammals. Flying bats share with flying birds the ability to move substantially greater distance per unit energy consumed than walking or running mammals. Calculations show that P. hastatus requires only one-sixth the energy to cover a given distance as does the same-size terrestrial mammal, while P. gouldii requires one-fourth the energy of the same-size terrestrial mammal. An empirically derived equation is presented which enables one to make estimates of the metabolic rates of bats and birds during level flight in nature from body mass data alone. Metabolic data obtained in this study are compared with predictions calculated from an avian flight theory.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  F. Sanchez, B. P. Kotler, C. Korine, and B. Pinshow Sugars are complementary resources to ethanol in foods consumed by Egyptian fruit bats J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2008; 211(9): 1475 - 1481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. W. Peters, D. A. Steiner, J. A. Rigoni, A. D. Mascilli, R. W. Schnepp, and S. P. Thomas Cardiorespiratory adjustments of homing pigeons to steady wind tunnel flight J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2005; 208(16): 3109 - 3120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. WATTS, E. J. MITCHELL, and S. M. SWARTZ A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL FOR ESTIMATING THE MECHANICS OF HORIZONTAL FLAPPING FLIGHT IN BATS: MODEL DESCRIPTION AND VALIDATION J. Exp. Biol., March 10, 2002; 204(16): 2873 - 2898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. K. Bartol, R. Mann, and M. R. Patterson Aerobic respiratory costs of swimming in the negatively buoyant brief squid Lolliguncula brevis J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 2001; 204(21): 3639 - 3653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Ward, U. Moller, J. M. V. Rayner, D. M. Jackson, D. Bilo, W. Nachtigall, and J. R. Speakman Metabolic power, mechanical power and efficiency during wind tunnel flight by the European starling Sturnus vulgaris J. Exp. Biol., January 10, 2001; 204(19): 3311 - 3322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Maina What it takes to fly: the structural and functional respiratory refinements in birds and bats J. Exp. Biol., January 10, 2000; 203(20): 3045 - 3064. [Abstract]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Bennett and J. Ruben Endothermy and activity in vertebrates Science, November 9, 1979; 206(4419): 649 - 654. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
