spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MACLEOD, G.D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MACLEOD, G.D.
Journal of Experimental Biology 87,65-72 (1980)
Published by Company of Biologists 1980


Mechanical Properties of Contour Feathers

G.D. MACLEOD 1

1 University of Nottingham, School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE12 5RD

Young's moduli (E) in bending and extension were measured for selected contour feather shafts from the chicken (Gallus domesticus), turkey (Meleagris gallopavo), ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) and herring gull (Larus argentatus). These were treated mechanically as tapering beams. In extension, E ranged from 45 to 181 MN m-2 and from 210 to 682 MN m-2 for the proximal and distal regions, respectively. Values obtained for the same regions in bending were from 5 to 24 MN m-2 and 457 to 1850 MN m-2. These results suggested that the cortex of the proximal region generally has a lower Young's modulus than the medulla, while for the distal region this is reversed. This was confirmed by further measurements on treated shafts. The observed systematic differences in the mechanical properties of the proximal and distal parts of contour feather shafts are consistent with their probable mechanical functions.

Accepted on October 5, 1979







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1980