spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by STORK, N. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by STORK, N. E.
Journal of Experimental Biology 88,91-108 (1980)
Published by Company of Biologists 1980


Experimental Analysis of Adhesion of Chrysolina Polita (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) on a Variety of Surfaces

N. E. STORK 1

1 Department of Zoology, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL

1. Pulling forces of Chrysolina polita (L.) on glass, perspex and cloth have been recorded and are plotted against body weight. The additional weight of eggs in many of the females is probably the main reason that, in females, pulling forces do. not increase significantly with body weight, whereas those of males do.

2. Pulling forces on glass and perspex are significantly correlated but, in general, neither are significantly correlated with those on cloth. This is because traction on glass and perspex is achieved by the adhesive setae, and on cloth by the tarsal claws.

3. Counts of the adhesive setae in 14 individuals indicate that numbers of climbing setae in females and males and females (combined), male setae in males, and the total number of adhesive setae in males, all show a significant increase with body weight.

4. Pulling force increases with the total number of adhesive setae in females, and males and females (combined).

Multiple regression analysis confirms the view that pulling force is a function of the number of adhesive setae.

5. Hooks, suction, electrostatic forces and seizure are largely discredited, and molecular adhesion between the setae and the substratum, and possibly the cohesive forces and surface tension of a thin fluid layer, are confirmed as the most likely modes of adhesion on smooth surfaces in C. polita and most beetles.

6. It is proposed that the main forces of detachment acting on a leaf beetle are probably drag and the whiplash effect of the leaves and branches. Estimates for the wind speeds required to remove beetles from glass and cloth by drag forces alone are calculated.

Submitted on December 12, 1979




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Heethoff and L. Koerner
Small but powerful: the oribatid mite Archegozetes longisetosus Aoki (Acari, Oribatida) produces disproportionately high forces
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2007; 210(17): 3036 - 3042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
W. Federle
Why are so many adhesive pads hairy?
J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2006; 209(14): 2611 - 2621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. Huber, H. Mantz, R. Spolenak, K. Mecke, K. Jacobs, S. N. Gorb, and E. Arzt
Evidence for capillarity contributions to gecko adhesion from single spatula nanomechanical measurements
PNAS, November 8, 2005; 102(45): 16293 - 16296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. N. Gorb and E. V. Gorb
Ontogenesis of the attachment ability in the bug Coreus marginatus (Heteroptera, Insecta)
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2004; 207(17): 2917 - 2924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
E. Gorb, V. Kastner, A. Peressadko, E. Arzt, L. Gaume, N. Rowe, and S. Gorb
Structure and properties of the glandular surface in the digestive zone of the pitcher in the carnivorous plant Nepenthes ventrata and its role in insect trapping and retention
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2004; 207(17): 2947 - 2963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. Gao and H. Yao
From the Cover: Shape insensitive optimal adhesion of nanoscale fibrillar structures
PNAS, May 25, 2004; 101(21): 7851 - 7856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
W. Federle, W. Baumgartner, and B. Holldobler
Biomechanics of ant adhesive pads: frictional forces are rate- and temperature-dependent
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2004; 207(1): 67 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. C. Hawthorn and B. D. Opell
van der Waals and hygroscopic forces of adhesion generated by spider capture threads
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2003; 206(22): 3905 - 3911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. Arzt, S. Gorb, and R. Spolenak
From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices
PNAS, September 16, 2003; 100(19): 10603 - 10606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. B. Kesel, A. Martin, and T. Seidl
Adhesion measurements on the attachment devices of the jumping spider Evarcha arcuata
J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2003; 206(16): 2733 - 2738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
K. Autumn and A. M. Peattie
Mechanisms of Adhesion in Geckos
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2002; 42(6): 1081 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
S. D. Eigenbrode and R. Jetter
Attachment to Plant Surface Waxes by an Insect Predator
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2002; 42(6): 1091 - 1099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
W. Federle, M. Riehle, A. S.G. Curtis, and R. J. Full
An Integrative Study of Insect Adhesion: Mechanics and Wet Adhesion of Pretarsal Pads in Ants
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2002; 42(6): 1100 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
S. N. Gorb, R. G. Beutel, E. V. Gorb, Y. Jiao, V. Kastner, S. Niederegger, V. L. Popov, M. Scherge, U. Schwarz, and W. Votsch
Structural Design and Biomechanics of Friction-Based Releasable Attachment Devices in Insects
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2002; 42(6): 1127 - 1139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. Autumn, M. Sitti, Y. A. Liang, A. M. Peattie, W. R. Hansen, S. Sponberg, T. W. Kenny, R. Fearing, J. N. Israelachvili, and R. J. Full
From the Cover: Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae
PNAS, September 17, 2002; 99(19): 12252 - 12256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
Z. Dai, S. N. Gorb, and U. Schwarz
Roughness-dependent friction force of the tarsal claw system in the beetle Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae)
J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2002; 205(16): 2479 - 2488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
O. Betz
Performance and adaptive value of tarsal morphology in rove beetles of the genus Stenus (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae)
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2002; 205(8): 1097 - 1113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S Gorb, E Gorb, and V Kastner
Scale effects on the attachment pads and friction forces in syrphid flies (Diptera, Syrphidae)
J. Exp. Biol., January 4, 2001; 204(8): 1421 - 1431.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Eisner and D. J. Aneshansley
Defense by foot adhesion in a beetle (Hemisphaerota cyanea)
PNAS, June 6, 2000; 97(12): 6568 - 6573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
Y Jiao, S Gorb, and M Scherge
Adhesion measured on the attachment pads of Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera, insecta)
J. Exp. Biol., January 6, 2000; 203(12): 1887 - 1895.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
W Federle, K Rohrseitz, and B Holldobler
Attachment forces of ants measured with a centrifuge: better 'wax-runners' have a poorer attachment to a smooth surface
J. Exp. Biol., January 2, 2000; 203(3): 505 - 512.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1980