spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by von Dassow, P.
Right arrow Articles by Latz, M. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by von Dassow, P.
Right arrow Articles by Latz, M. I.

The role of Ca2+ in stimulated bioluminescence of the dinoflagellate Lingulodinium polyedrum

Peter von Dassow* and Michael I. Latz

Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037-0202, USA



View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Stimulation of luminescence by ionomycin. (A) Integrated luminescence over a total of 200 s (filled circles) and over the first 12 s (open circles) during and after addition of different concentrations of ionomycin or control solution to night-phase cells of Lingulodinium polyedrum in Hepes-buffered filtered seawater (HbFSW; N=3-4 for each stimulus tested). Values are means ± S.D. (B—D) Calcium dependence of luminescence stimulation by ionomycin when added to night-phase cells in Ca-free artificial seawater (ASW; total [Ca] = <40 µmol l-1 and cheated by 1 mmol l-1 EGTA). (B) Ionomycin treatment at a final concentration of 5 µmol l-1 plus 2xCa to return extracellular Ca2+ to normal levels. The bar below the x-axis marks the approximate time of injection. (C) As in (B), but ionomycin was added without Ca2+. There was decreased stimulation and the time course of stimulation was slower. (D) Integrated luminescence produced by ionomycin or a control solution when added to Ca-free cells with or without simultaneous replacement of Ca2+ (N=11 for all stimuli except for 0.5% DMSO without Ca, for which N=5). Integrated luminescence over a total of 200 s (filled bars) and over the first 12 s (open bars) is shown. Values are means ± S.D.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Flow-stimulated luminescence in Lingulodinium polyedrum. (A) Stimulation by stirring, which started at approximately 13.4 s. (B) Computed maximum shear stress for Couette flow during and after 1 s acceleration of the outer cylinder to final velocities of 0.8-6.4 revs s-1 (final shear stress=0.11-0.86 N m-2). (C) Typical responses of night-phase cells to the developing Couette flows shown in (B).

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effects of 5 µmol l-1 BAPTA-AM treatment. (A) Effect of stirring of samples tested at different times after treatment. BAPTA-AM treatment (open circles) decreased mechanically sensitive luminescence (integrated over 6 s stirring; 1st 6 s MSL) compared with control-treated samples (filled circles). The curve represents an exponential decay model fit to the data: y=3.0x108 e-0.0933t (r2=0.93), where y is the 6 s integrated MSL, and t is the treatment time in min. (B) Spontaneous glow emission of BAPTA-AM-treated (open circles) and control-treated (filled circles) samples. (C) Response of BAPTA-AM-treated and control-treated samples to developing Couette flow.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effects of 5 µmol l-1 BAPTA-AM treatment on other luminescent parameters. (A) Integrated luminescence stimulated by addition of BAPTA-AM (open bars) or control (filled bars) solutions, and mechanically sensitive luminescence (1st 6 s MSL) and total luminescent capacity (TLC) of the same samples 40-50 min later (N=4 for each treatment). Values are means ± S.D. Only 1st 6 s MSL was significantly different between treatments (t=-10.3, P<0.0001). (B) Response to 5 µmol l-1 ionomycin after 40-50 min of BAPTA-AM or control treatment. Total ionomycin-sensitive luminescence (TISL) integrated over 200 s and the first 12 s of integrated ionomycin-sensitive luminescence (1st 12 s ISL) were measured (N=4 for each treatment). Values are means ± S.D.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Effects of Ruthenium Red. (A, B) Effects of Ruthenium Red on luminescence parameters assayed by stirring. Values are means ± S.D. (A) Effect of Ruthenium Red on relative luminescent response. Total luminescent capacity (TLC) was normalized to the mean of the control samples run on each date of testing (open squares). Mechanically sensitive luminescence was integrated over the first 6 s (1st 6 s MSL; filled circles) and over a total of 200 s (TMSL; filled diamonds) while stirring and normalized to TLC of each sample (N=3-10 for each treatment). (B) Effect of Ruthenium Red on maximum intensity of mechanically sensitive luminescence (Max I) normalized to TLC for each sample. (C) Effects of Ruthenium Red on motility and ecdysis. Cells not swimming in suspension (on bottom; filled circles) and empty theca (open circles) are expressed as proportions of pigmented cells (N=3-9). Values are means ± S.D. (D) Effect of Ruthenium Red on the response to developing Couette flow. Results are representative of five independent samples tested for each 0 µmol l-1, 5 µmol l-1 or 50 µmol l-1 treatment.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Stimulation of luminescence by increasing [K+]. (A) Sample records of luminescence stimulated by addition of solutions containing high (31 mmol l-1) or low (6 mmol l-1) [K+]. The box beneath the x-axis marks the time of injection (controlled by a syringe pump). (B) Dose-dependence of stimulation by K+. Integrated luminescence (over 200 s total) stimulated by addition of [K+] solutions normalized to total luminescent capacity (K+-SL/TLC) for each sample tested (N=4-7). Data are expressed as means ± S.D. and are a function of [K+] in the test solution added rather than the final [K+], because much of the stimulation occurs before mixing of solution can be completed, especially at high [K+] (N=4-7 for each stimulus tested).

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. The role of Ca2+ in K+-sensitive luminescence. Results are expressed as 200 s integrated luminescent response to stimulation by addition of indicated volume of low (7.5 µmol l-1) or high (108 µmol l-1) [K+] solutions. (A) K+ stimulation following 40-50 min treatment with 5 µmol l-1 BAPTA-AM (open bar) or control solution (filled bar) (N=5-6 for each treatment/stimulus combination tested). (B) K+-stimulation of Ca-free cell suspensions with (filled bar) or without (open bar) simultaneous replacement of Ca2+ in stimulating solution (N=5 for each stimulus tested). n.d.=not determined. Values are means ± S.D.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Inhibition of K+-sensitive luminescence by Ruthenium Red. The integrated response to [K+] over 200 s was normalized to total luminescent capacity (K+-SL/TLC) for each sample to compensate for modest decrease of apparent TLC after Ruthenium Red treatment (N=4-10 for each treatment/stimulus combination tested). Values are means ± S.D. Treatment for >4 h with 50 µmol l-1 Ruthenium Red inhibited stimulation by added solutions containing low to moderate [K+] but not high [K+].

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002