Variation in speed, gait characteristics and microhabitat use in lacertid lizards
Bieke Vanhooydonck*,
Raoul Van Damme and
Peter Aerts
University of Antwerp (U.I.A.), Department of Biology,
Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Wilrijk, Belgium

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Speeds at which the lizards ran on the treadmill for each species. Each dot
represents a digitised sequence. Full species names are given in
Table 1.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Hypothesised phylogenetic relationships among the 11 lacertid lizard
species under study. The phylogeny is incompletely resolved, and this tree
should be considered a best approximation. Polytomies are treated as `hard'
for the purposes of phylogenetic analyses (see text).
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Graphical representations of the multiple regression analyses we performed
on the morphological, gait characteristics and performance data in the 11
lacertid lizard species. (A) All potential relationships. Each arrow
represents one analysis. Independent variables introduced into the same
multiple regression are boxed. Arrows are drawn from the independent variables
box to the dependent variable box. We performed two series of analyses: one
that included the (contrasts of the) values for the four gait characteristics
at maximal sprint speed, and the second on the (contrasts of the) slopes of
each of the four gait characteristics against speed. (B) Significant
relationships in the multiple regression analyses including the contrasts of
the estimated values of the four gait characteristics at maximal sprint speed.
(C) Significant relationships in the multiple regression analyses including
the contrasts of the slopes of each gait characteristic against speed. By
definition, the contrasts of the slopes of stride length and stride frequency
against speed are inversely related so we never introduced them simultaneously
into the analyses. Instead, we included only the contrasts of the slopes of
stride frequency against speed in the analysis; including the contrasts of the
slopes of stride length against speed gives the opposite result
(r=0.56; P=0.075).
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Bivariate correlations between the contrasts of microhabitat use and the
contrasts of the slopes of stride frequency against speed (forced through the
origin). (A) Relationship between the contrasts of time spent in the open
microhabitat and the contrasts of the slopes of stride frequency against
speed. (B) Correlation between the contrasts of time spent in the vegetated
microhabitat and the contrasts of the slopes of stride frequency against
speed. In both cases, including the contrasts of the slopes of stride length
against speed gives the opposite result (r=0.76, P=0.017;
r=-0.62, P=0.074, respectively).
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002