spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scott, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, C. M.

Cadmium disrupts behavioural and physiological responses to alarm substance in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

Graham R. Scott1,*, Katherine A. Sloman1, Claude Rouleau2 and Chris M. Wood1

1 Department of Biology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada
2 National Water Research Institute, PO Box 5050, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, Ontario L7R 4A6, Canada



View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Diagrammatic representation of the observation tank. Fine sewing thread was placed on the outside of each tank to indicate the tank midline (dotted line). A fish scored one midline crossing each time its head (from snout to end of operculum) passed the midline. Tanks also contained a shelter and air stone and a point of introduction for food and alarm substance. Diagram not to scale.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Mean change in (A) the number of midline crossings, (B) the number of feeding bites, (C) the latency to first feed and (D) the time spent under shelter before and after stimulus for different cadmium (Cd) exposures (N=16 for each group). * represents a significant difference from the DDW (distilled deionized water) control (P<0.05). {dagger} represents a significant difference from the skin extract control (P<0.05); ** represents a significant difference from the DDW control (P=0.001) using an unpaired t-test only.

 


View larger version (64K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. (A) Schematic representation of the fish olfactory system, portraying cell bodies and dendrites of olfactory neurons within the olfactory epithelium. Axons of olfactory neurons extend via the olfactory nerve to the olfactory bulb where they synapse with post-synaptic bulbar neurons (after Hara, 1986Go). The broken line indicates the theoretical boundary separating the olfactory bulb from the olfactory nerve. (B) Sagittal whole-body autoradiogram showing 109Cd accumulation after 7-day Cd exposure followed by 2-day depuration in control water. (C) Corresponding whole-body tissue section. OR, olfactory rosette; ON, olfactory nerve; OB, olfactory bulb.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. (A) Accumulation of cadmium (Cd) after 0, 3, 5 and 7 days exposure, as well as 7 days exposure followed by a 2-day depuration period in control water, in the olfactory rosette, olfactory nerve and olfactory bulb. Calculated Cd accumulation (right-hand y-axis) was determined as described in Materials and methods. All points within each tissue are statistically distinct (P<0.05) before transfer to control water (depuration period). (B) Concentration index relative to mean fish liver concentrations for the olfactory rosette, olfactory nerve and olfactory bulb. * represents a significant difference between fish exposed for 7 days and those exposed for 7 days followed by 2 days of depuration (P<0.05).

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Liver, kidney, gill and whole-body cadmium burdens for 0 µg Cd l–1 (control), 2 µg Cd l–1 (7-day waterborne exposure) and 3 µg Cd g–1 (7-day dietary exposure at 1% daily ration). Each exposure was followed by a 2-day depuration period in control water (N>=17 for each group). * represents a significant difference from the control (P<0.05).

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. (A) Plasma cortisol and (B) plasma ion concentrations before (control) and at increasing time points after introduction of skin extract into tanks (N=10 for each group). * represents a significant difference from the control (P<0.05).

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Plasma cortisol concentrations for rainbow trout exposed to control or cadmium exposures of either 2 µg Cd l–1 waterborne or 3 µg Cd g–1 dietary (at 1% daily ration) for 7 days, followed by a 2-day depuration period in control water (N>=7 for each group). Plasma samples were taken 15 min after introduction of either distilled deionized water (DDW control) or skin extract stimuli. * represents a significant difference between fish given DDW stimulus and those given skin extract stimulus within each cadmium (Cd) treatment group (P<0.05). {dagger} represents a significant difference from Cd-unexposed skin extract control (P<0.05).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003