The effects of gape angle and bite point on bite force in bats
Elizabeth R. Dumont1,* and
Anthony Herrel2
1 Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Morrill
Science Center, 611 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA 01003-9297,
USA
2 Laboratory of Functional Morphology, Department of Biology, University of
Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Antwerpen, Belgium

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Least-squares regression of size-adjusted bite force (residuals of maximum
bite force against head length) against gape angle during bilateral canine
biting (slope=1.51, r2=0.49, P=0.017). The
dotted lines represent 95% confidence intervals. Each point represents a
species mean: 1Artibeus jamaicensis;
2Eidolon helvum; 3Pteropus vampyrus;
4Phyllostomus hastatus; 5Cynopterus
brachyotis; 6Pteropus poliocephalus;
7Erophylla sezekorni; 8Carollia
perspicillata; 9Monophyllus redmani;
10Glossophaga soricina; 11Rousettus
aegyptiacus.
|
|

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Absolute bite force (means ± S.D.) during bilateral
canine biting at increasing gape angles in four species of bats. Species are
arranged from left to right in order of increasing head length
(Table 1). Gape angles are
given below each bar.
|
|

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. The relationship between bite point and relative bite force (with respect
to maximum bite force) within each of seven bat species. Bars represent
species means. Species are arranged from left to right in order of increasing
head length (Table 1). MR,
Monophyllus redmani; ES, Erophylla sezekorni; PH,
Phyllostomus hastatus; RA, Rousettus aegyptiacus; EH,
Eidolon helvum; PP, Pteropus poliocephalus; PV, Pteropus
vampyrus.
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003