spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online July 23, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tam, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ip, Y. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tam, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ip, Y. K.

The osmotic response of the Asian freshwater stingray (Himantura signifer) to increased salinity: a comparison with marine (Taeniura lymma) and Amazonian freshwater (Potamotrygon motoro) stingrays

Wai L. Tam1, Wai P. Wong1, Ai M. Loong1, Kum C. Hiong1, Shit F. Chew2, James S. Ballantyne3 and Yuen K. Ip1,*

1 Department of Biological Science, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 117543, Republic of Singapore
2 Natural Sciences, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, 1 Nanyang Walk, Singapore 637616, Republic of Singapore
3 Department of Zoology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, NIG 2W1



View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Changes in the ammonia excretion rate (µmol day-1 g-1 fish) of H. signifer during progressive increase in salinity from 0.7{per thousand} to 20{per thousand} though an 8-day period. Open bars represent constant 0.7{per thousand} salinity for 8 days (control). Filled bars represent increasing salinity from 0.7{per thousand} (day 1) to 5{per thousand} (day 2) to 10{per thousand} (day 3) to 15{per thousand} (day 4) to 20{per thousand} (day 5), where it remained until day 8. Results represent means + S.E.M. (N=3). * Significantly different from 0.7{per thousand} control condition at P<0.05; a,b significantly different from the corresponding day 1 and 2 values, respectively, at P<0.05.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Changes in the urea excretion rate (µmol day-1 g-1 fish) of H. signifer during progressive increase in salinity from 0.7{per thousand} to 20{per thousand} though an 8-day period. Open bars represent constant 0.7{per thousand} salinity for 8 days. Filled bars represent increasing salinity from 0.7{per thousand} (day 1) to 5{per thousand} (day 2) to 10{per thousand} (day 3) to 15{per thousand} (day 4) to 20{per thousand} (day 5), where it remained until day 8. Results represent means + S.E.M. (N=3). * Significantly different from 0.7{per thousand} control condition at P<0.05; a,b significantly different from the corresponding day 1 and 2 values, respectively, at P<0.05.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003