spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kozaka, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ando, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kozaka, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ando, M.

Central effects of various ligands on drinking behavior in eels acclimated to seawater

Tomohiro Kozaka, Yasuaki Fujii and Masaaki Ando*

Laboratory of Integrative Physiology, Faculty of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8521, Japan



View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Position of the cerebral cannula. At the front of the supraoccipital bone, the skull was drilled (A). The position of the cannula is shown schematically (B) and photographically (C) from the lateral side of the brain.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Dose—response curves of the effect of eel angiotensin II (eANG II; filled circles), isoproterenol (filled triangles) and acetyl choline (Ach; open circles) on water intake by seawater eels. Water intake was measured during a 20 min period after administration of the ligand, and is expressed as % of the control rate measured during a 20 min period before administration (100%). The injection rate was 1.25 µl min-1 for 4 min. Values are means ± S.E.M. Number of experiments is indicated in parentheses. *P<0.05, **P<0.001, compared with the control value (paired t-test).

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Dose—response curves of various inhibitors on water intake by seawater eels. Water intake was measured during a 20 min period after administration of the inhibitor, and is expressed as % of control rate measured during a 20 min period before administration (100%). Ghrelin (filled squares), eel atrial natriuretic peptide (eANP; filled circles), serotonin (5-HT; open circles), phenylephrine (filled diamonds), prolactin (PRL; open triangles) and {gamma}-amino butyric acid (GABA; filled triangles) were injected intracranially at a rate of 1.25 µl min-1 for 4 min. Values are means ± S.E.M. Number of experiments is indicated in parentheses. *P<0.05, **P<0.001, compared with the control value (paired t-test).

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Time course of the effect of intravenous (i.v., open circles) and intracranial (i.c., filled circles) administration of eel angiotensin II (eANG II). The dose of eANG II, 10-7 mol i.v. and 5x10-11 mol i.c., was chosen to obtain similar enhancement of water intake. For comparison, the time course of the effect of intracranial eel atrial natriuretic peptide (eANP, filled squares) is also shown. Water intake was measured every 5 min, and expressed as mean ± S.E.M. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, compared with the value before administration at time zero (paired t-test).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003