spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stensmyr, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hansson, B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stensmyr, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hansson, B. S.

Novel natural ligands for Drosophila olfactory receptor neurones

Marcus C. Stensmyr1, Elena Giordano2, Annalisa Balloi2, Anna-Maria Angioy2 and Bill S. Hansson1,*

1 Division of Chemical Ecology, Department of Crop Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 44, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
2 Department of Experimental Biology, University of Cagliari, S.S. 554 Km, 4500 Monserrato, Italy



View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Simultaneously recorded activity of two co-located olfactory receptor neurones. Differences in action potential (spike) amplitude allow for separation of activity. Stimulation with a blank results in no increased activity from any of the neurones. Stimulation with ethyl 3-hydroxybutyrate elicits a strong response from the smaller spiking neurone, indicated by `B' (neurone later classified as S2B), whereas the larger spiking neurone, indicated by `A' is unaffected by the stimulus. Boxed area shows an expanded part of the recording. Horizontal bar indicates stimulus duration, 0.5 s.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. A linked gas chromatography—single cell recording from an antennal sensillum (S5) containing two olfactory receptor neurones (ORNs). (A) Gas chromatogram (GC) of a papaya head-space sample and the corresponding single-cell recording (SC), presented in histogram form (spikes s-1; vertical bar, 25 spikes s-1; horizontal bar, 1 min). The two ORNs present are sensitive to different components in the papaya volatile collection. The S5A neurone responds primarily to butyl butyrate (5), but also to 1-hexanol (2) and isovaleric acid (4). The S5B neurone responds strongly to isoamyl acetate (3) and moderately to butyl acetate (1). (B) Action potential amplitudes recorded during the above experiment. The distribution of amplitudes from the recording shows the clear physiological separation of the two ORNs (S5A and S5B).

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Physiological sensillum types were identified by the response spectra of their olfactory receptor neurones (ORNs) when challenged with volatiles collected from different fruits. (A) An S3A ORN (number 52) stimulated with a volatile collection from passion fruit. A strong response is elicited by ethyl hexanoate [peak 4 in the gas chromatogram (GC)], while smaller responses are elicited by ethyl butyrate (1), ethyl 3-hydroxybutyrate (2), ethyl 3-hydroxyhexanoate (5) and an unidentified compound (3). The physiological response is represented in the histogram displaying the single cell (SC) response over time (spikes s-1; vertical bar, 25 spikes s-1; horizontal bar, 1 min). (B) The same neurone challenged with a volatile collection from banana reveals three smaller responses to isoamyl acetate (6), methyl hexanoate (7) and butyl butyrate (8). (C) Two S3A ORNs (numbers 19 and 31) show the repeatability of the responses of a certain ORN type to a particular extract, here a pineapple volatile collection, where ethyl hexanoate (4) is again the major stimulus, while methyl hexanoate (7) elicits a weaker response.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Identified classes of antennal sensilla based on physiological characteristics of olfactory receptor neurones (ORNs) present. Each sensillum type (S1—S8) is presented together with the response spectra of the respective ORNs (A, B, C and D) housed within each sensillum type. Beneath the sensillum type the number (N) encountered is indicated. Beneath the molecular configuration of each ligand type the maximum response is indicated (spikes s-1). NR, no response to any tested stimulus.

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Antennal distribution of the sensillum types identified. (A) Frontal view of a Drosophila head. The olfactory organs, antennae (above) and maxillary palps (below), are marked in green. (B) Schematic drawing of the Drosophila third antennal segment's posterior and anterior face. LB, large s. basiconica region; A, arista; S, sacculus entrance; ST, s. trichodea region. The locations of the different sensillum types investigated are indicated by coloured circles (corresponding to the colours in Fig. 4). The total number of each sensillum type encountered is indicated in parentheses. Circles with a black dot in the centre represent investigation with GC—SC methodology, while open circles were characterised by stimulation with synthetic compounds.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Dose—response relationships for five of the identified olfactory receptor neurone (ORN) classes. Odorants were presented in increasing dosages from 0.1 ng to 10 µg (x-axis). ORN response to a stimulus is given as the net number of action potentials (number of spikes during 1 s after stimulation minus the number of spikes during 1 s prior to stimulation) minus the net blank response (y-axis). (A) Dose—response curves for the S3A neurone type, (B) S2B type, (C) S1B type, (D) S5A type and (E) S8B type. For details on each ORN type, see Fig. 4. Vertical bars indicate the S.E.M.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Behavioural responses to a set of the identified ligands. Fly behaviour was tested in a T-maze setup and odorants were presented over a wide concentration range. The behavioural response functions are based on 392 experiments with a total of 7120 flies. A response index (RI) of 1.0 equals full attraction, whereas an RI of -1.0 equals full avoidance. Indifference to the odour is indicated by an RI of 0. (A) RI curve for acetoin (N=89, number of experiments used to create the RI curve), (B) butyl butyrate (N=43), (C) ethyl hexanoate (N=57), (D) ethyl 3-hydroxybutyrate (N=52), (E) 1-hexanol (N=51), (F) phenylacetonitrile (N=46), (G) ethyl acetate (N=48). Asterisks indicate RI values significantly different from zero (P<0.05, {chi}2 test). Vertical bars indicate the S.E.M.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003