spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Franklin, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Seebacher, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Franklin, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Seebacher, F.

The effect of heat transfer mode on heart rate responses and hysteresis during heating and cooling in the estuarine crocodile Crocodylus porosus

Craig E. Franklin1 and Frank Seebacher2,*

1 Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
2 School of Biological Sciences A08, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia



View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Representative examples of the heart rate (solid line) and body temperature (broken line) response to the different treatments: (A) heat lamp dry; (B) heat lamp wet; (C) hot water. The vertical lines indicate the time when the treatment commenced (i.e. when the heat lamp was switched on or hot water was introduced; line on the left) and when it was concluded (right-hand line). Note the almost instantaneous increase and decrease in heart rate when the heat was applied and removed, respectively, which occurred while body temperature change was negligible. Note that values on the y-axis denote both heart rate and body temperature (Tb).

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Mean heart rate (averaged over 1°C body temperature intervals, ± S.E.M.) was significantly faster during heating than during cooling at any given body temperature in all treatments – (A) heat lamp dry, (B) heat lamp wet, (C) hot water – although the difference was least pronounced in the heat lamp wet treatment.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Representative examples of body temperature (broken lines) and heart rate (solid lines) responses to the control treatments: (A) cold light and (B) cold water. The solid vertical lines indicate when the cold light was switched on and off (in A) or when water flow was commenced (in B). None of the control treatments elicited a significant heart rate response. Note that values on the y-axis denote both heart rate and body temperature (Tb).

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. (A) Q10 values for the change in heart rate during heating and cooling in the heat lamp dry treatment (means ± S.E.M.). During the initial `rapid cardiac response' to the application or removal of heat, heart rate changed dramatically while body temperature (Tb) remained nearly stable. (B,C) Close-up views of representative examples for the rapid response periods are shown. Q10 values for the heart rate change during the `rapid response' periods were extremely high (>4000, represented by >>20 on the y-axis), indicating the temperature independence of heart rate during those periods. The times when the heat lamp was switched on and off are indicated by the solid vertical lines. Note that values on the y-axis in B and C denote both heart rate and body temperature.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Changes in heart rate during heating and cooling changed in proportion to the heat load experienced at the animal surface (means ± S.E.M.). (A) The heart rate response to heat load was sigmoidal in shape, with rapid decreases and increases below –15 W and above 25 W, respectively. The range of heat loads experienced by the animals was greatest during the hot water (HW) treatment and least in the heat lamp wet (HLW) treatment. The fitted line shows a rational function. (B) Changes in heart rate during the linear portion of the sigmoidal curve (–16 W to 20 W) increased with increasing heat load. Over this linear range, there were no differences between the heat lamp dry (HLD) and HLW treatments, but rates of change were significantly less in the HW treatment. Linear regression lines are shown for the HW treatment (broken line) and for the HLD and HLW treatments combined (solid line).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2003