spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online April 8, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 1729-1739 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00930
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lima, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kültz, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lima, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kültz, D.

Laser scanning cytometry and tissue microarray analysis of salinity effects on killifish chloride cells

Raquel N. Lima and Dietmar Kültz*

University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Salinity acclimation regimens used in this study. Killifish were subjected to either acute transfer from freshwater (FW) to 1x seawater (SW, 1000 mosmol kg-1, green circles) or to gradual transfer from FW to 2.4x SW (2400 mosmol kg-1). During gradual transfers the salinity was increased either at a rate of 300 mosmol kg-1 per day (red triangles) or 250 mosmol kg-1 per day (black triangles) until it reached 2400 mosmol kg-1. FW controls were transferred once on the first day to FW (blue diamonds).

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. (A-C) Laser scanning cytometry (LSC) analysis of chloride cells (CC) from killifish acclimated for 10 days to FW (blue), 1x SW (green) and 2.4x SW (red). CC were identified based on DASPMI fluorescence with the LSC. CC area and maximal intensity of DASPMI fluorescence were recorded for each CC during scanning by WinCyte software and plotted as scattergrams. (A) FW; (B) 1x SW; (C) 2.4x SW. The boxes enclose all accepted data and the circles enclose events that were used for generating image galleries with the LSC relocation function. (D-F) Additional scattergrams showing the relationship between CC area and integrated DASPMI fluorescence per CC were also recorded. (D) FW; (E) 1x SW; (F) 2.4x SW. CCs have higher DASPMI fluorescence than other cell types and are colored in all panels.

 


View larger version (47K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Laser scanning images (A-C) and corresponding LSC histogram (D) of chloride cells (CC) from killifish exposed to FW, 1x SW or 2.4x SW for 1 week. Image galleries were acquired using the relocation function of the LSC. Cells shown in image galleries represent CC from within the circled areas in Fig. 2A-C. (A) CC from FW fish; (B) CC from 1x SW fish; (C) CC from 2.4x SW fish. (D) Histogram of CC area from fish acclimated to FW (blue), 1x SW (green) and 2.4x SW (red). The arrow points to a population of small cells that may represent accessory cells in the SW groups. Bars, 50 µm.

 


View larger version (53K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Laser scanning images (A-C) and corresponding LSC histogram (D) of chloride cells (CC) from killifish exposed to FW, 1x SW or 2.4x SW for 2 weeks. Image galleries were acquired as described for Fig. 4. (A) CC from FW fish; (B) CC from 1x SW fish; (C) CC from 2.4x SW fish. (D) Histogram of CC area from fish acclimated to FW (blue), 1x SW (green) and 2.4x SW (red). The arrow points to a population of small cells that may represent accessory cells. Note the shift of CC to a larger area in the SW treatment groups compared to Fig. 4. Bars, 50 µm.

 


View larger version (59K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Laser scanning images (A-C) and corresponding LSC histogram (D) of chloride cells (CC) from killifish exposed to FW, 1x SW or 2.4x SW for 5 weeks. Image galleries were acquired as described for Fig. 4. (A) CC from FW fish; (B) CC from 1x SW fish; (C) CC from 2.4x SW fish. (D) Histogram of CC area from fish acclimated to FW (blue), 1x SW (green) and 2.4x SW (red). The arrow points to a population of small cells that may represent accessory cells. Note the shift of CCs to a larger area in the 2.4x SW treatment group compared to Fig. 5. Bars, 50 µm.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Chloride cell (CC) number and size determined by LSC analysis from gill epithelial cell suspensions obtained after 10 days of acute and gradual acclimation from FW to SW. (A) CC number does not increase significantly after acclimation to 1x SW or 2.4x SW (P>0.05 in each case). (B) CC volume increases significantly after acclimation to 1x and 2.4x SW (P<0.05; aFW vs. 1x SW, bFW vs. 2.4x SW, c1x SW vs. 2.4x SW). N=4 animals for each salinity and time.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Mean chloride cell (CC) number and size determined by LSC analysis from gill epithelial cell suspensions after acute or gradual acclimation from FW (blue diamonds) to 1x SW (green circles) or 2.4x SW (red triangles), respectively, versus acclimation period. (A) In the 1x SW group, CC volume is significantly larger at all the times analyzed (P<0.05) but does not continue to increase after 2 weeks. In contrast, during 5 weeks of 2.4x SW acclimation CC become significantly larger only after 2 weeks, but continue to increase (P<0.05). (B) CC number does not significantly increase until 2 weeks for 2.4x SW and until 5 weeks for 1x SW acclimation (P<0.05; aFW vs. 1x SW, bFW vs. 2.4x SW, c1x SW vs. 2.4x SW). N=4 animals for each salinity and time.

 


View larger version (47K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Quantification of Na+/K+-ATPase per chloride cell (CC) and CC area dependence on salinity and acclimation period. (A) Tissue microarray containing 1 mm cores of gill filament from fish acclimated to FW or SW for different times. Bar, 1 mm. (B) Na+/K+-ATPase antibody combined with PacificBlue-conjugated secondary antibody specifically labels CC. (C) Automatic laser scanning cytometer (LSC) contouring of CC in the same area as shown in A. (D) Quantification of Na+/K+-ATPase content per CC based on LSC analysis (FW, blue diamonds; 1x SW, green circles; 2.4x SW, red triangles). Na+/K+-ATPase in CC is significantly but transiently elevated only at 1 week for fish acclimated to 1x SW (P<0.05). In contrast, Na+/K+-ATPase in CC is significantly elevated at all times measured in fish acclimated to 2.4x SW (P<0.05) (E) CC area based on contouring of Na+/K+-ATPase fluorescence as shown in B. Although elevated at all times for both 1x and 2.4x SW groups the increase is statistically significant only at 1 week (P<0.05; aFW vs. 1x SW, bFW vs. 2.4x SW, c1x SW vs. 2.4x SW). N=4 animals for each salinity and time.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Total Na+/K+-ATPase content in all gill CC of F. heteroclitus acclimated to FW (blue diamonds), 1x SW (green circles), or 2.4x SW (red triangles) expressed as relative fluorescence units (RFU). (A) Time dependence of total Na+/K+-ATPase content at different salinity acclimation regimens (P<0.05; aFW vs. 1x SW, bFW vs. 2.4x SW, c1x SW vs. 2.4x SW). (B) Salinity-dependence of total Na+/K+-ATPase content after 5 weeks of acclimation. The data fit an exponential regression with r2=0.981. N=4 animals for each salinity and time.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004