spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online April 23, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 1789-1796 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00967
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Quintana, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Quintana, F.

Surface pauses in relation to dive duration in imperial cormorants; how much time for a breather?

Rory P. Wilson1,* and Flavio Quintana2

1 Institut für Meereskunde, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
2 Centro Nacional Patagonico (Conicet) (9120) Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina



View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (A) Example of the cumulative pause duration versus the cumulative dive duration for a dive sequence (B) of a single imperial cormorant foraging in water between 10 and 50 m deep. Note that the steeper slope of the gradient in deeper waters is not as obvious as it otherwise might be because the presentation of the cumulative values irons out a great deal of variability in single pause versus dive duration values.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Relationship between the time taken to (A) descend, (B) move along the bottom, (C) ascend and (D) complete the full dive, as a function of maximum depth reached during the dive for 14 imperial cormorants foraging in coastal waters off Argentina.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Relationship between the ratio of the pause duration at the surface and the time spent underwater as a function of the time spent underwater during dives to constant depths (see text) for 14 imperial cormorants foraging in coastal waters off Argentina.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. (A) Simulated oxygen saturation curve for an imperial cormorant during time at the surface after dives. The arrows show the calculated pre- and post-dive oxygen concentrations for dives of two different durations. (B) Projected pre- (upper lines) and post- (lower) dive body oxygen concentrations as a function of steady state diving for dives of particular durations in the imperial cormorant. The value between the upper and lower curves shows the oxygen used during the dive, and the value between the lower curve and the x-axis shows the oxygen reserve carried by the bird. Varying values of the rate constant, k, shift the curves up or down.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Necessary time invested by an imperial cormorant to cater for oxygen acquisition at the surface as a function of dive duration, starting from a body oxygen concentration of zero. We assume that the bird must acquire oxygen for two processes; (i) diving and (ii) as a reserve, and that the acquisition of the oxygen for the two processes occurs in distinct phases. This condition is given by the output of the model (see text), which projects that birds do not actually normally use their reserves and therefore must acquire oxygen for the dive at a slower rate than they would otherwise do if they had no reserves. For comparison the figure details two options: oxygen is acquired for the projected dive first (solid line, `dives first') followed by acquisition of the reserves (solid line, `reserves second' – cf. Fig. 4B) and (the most likely situation) that oxygen is acquired for the reserves first (broken line, `reserves first') followed by oxygen for the dive (broken line, `dives second'). Since, however, the reserves are not normally used, the drop in efficiency for cormorants diving with reserves, compared with those diving without (top dotted line), is given by the time necessary to build up necessary oxygen levels from a body oxygen concentration of zero (the solid `dives first' line) divided by the time necessary to build up necessary oxygen levels from a body oxygen concentration equivalent to that used in reserves (the broken `dives second' line).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004