spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online June 16, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 2551-2563 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01066
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Osta, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kafatos, F. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Osta, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kafatos, F. C.

Innate immunity in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae: comparative and functional genomics

Mike A. Osta, George K. Christophides, Dina Vlachou and Fotis C. Kafatos*

European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany



View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic view of Plasmodium sporogonic (sexual) cycle and mosquito defence reactions during midgut invasion. (1) Exflagellation of microgametocytes soon after ingestion of infectious blood, giving rise to eight flagellated microgametes; (2) fertilization of macrogametes to form the zygote; (3) zygote development to a motile ookinete that invades the midgut epithelium at approximately 24 h post infection; (4) ookinete invasion arrests at the basal lamina where the parasite rounds up to form the non-motile oocyst. Several mitotic divisions within the oocyst give rise to thousands of sporozoites dramatically amplifying the parasite load; (5) oocyst rupture, at approximately 12 days post infection, and release of sporozoites into the haemolymph; (6) sporozoite migration through the haemolymph and invasion of the salivary gland. The sporozoites reside in the salivary gland lumen from where they are injected into the vertebrate host during the next bite. (a) Major parasite losses occur during the first 24 h post infection; (b) killing and subsequent melanization of ookinetes in a refractory strain, a process involving several mosquito factors including POs, LRIM1 and TEP1; (c) killing of ookinetes inside the cytoplasm of midgut epithelial cells through TEP1- and possibly LRIM1-mediated lysis; (d) ookinetes protected from killing by mosquito factors, including CTL4 and CTLMA2, successfully reach the basal lamina and develop into oocysts.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Control of the expression of Drosophila antimicrobial peptide genes is mediated by the Toll and immuno deficiency (IMD) pathways. Colour-coding separates the components of each pathway. For explanations, refer to main text.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Schematic model of LRIM1 and CTL (CTL4 and CTLMA2) protein action during Plasmodium development in the mosquito midgut. During or soon after invasion of the midgut epithelium (four downward-oriented arrows), three out of four invading ookinetes are eliminated, partly through the antagonistic action of LRIM1 (upward-oriented arrows). However, CTL4 and, to a lesser extent, CTLMA2 protect the remaining ookinetes from the melanization response (slanted black bars); melanization also requires LRIM1 activity (horizontal arrow).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004