spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online July 2, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 2745-2753 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.01091
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Meij, M. A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bout, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van der Meij, M. A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bout, R. G.

Scaling of jaw muscle size and maximal bite force in finches

M. A. A. van der Meij* and R. G. Bout

Department of Evolutionary Morphology, Institute of Biology Leiden, PO Box 9516, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands



View larger version (68K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Tool for bite force measurements. A: rigid metal plates that are slightly pressed together by the bills of a bird biting on the plates (notice the rounded ridge to prevent pressure of the rest of the bill). B: connection to the force transducer.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Regression lines for jaw muscle mass versus body mass with common slope (r2=0.890) for estrildids (grey squares; Y=0.63+1.29X) and fringillids (black triangles; Y=0.81+1.29X).

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Regression lines for the log-transformed mass of different jaw muscle groups versus log transformed body mass with common slope (r2=0.908) for estrildids (grey) and fringillids (black). Markers used in separate muscle complexes graphs equals the all muscle complexes graph.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Regression lines for bite force versus body mass with common slope (r2=0.87) for estrildids (grey squares; y=–1.19+1.44x) and fringillids (black triangles; y=–1.04+1.44x).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004