spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online February 20, 2004
Journal of Experimental Biology 207, 1063-1072 (2004)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2004
doi: 10.1242/jeb.00848
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Birch, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dickinson, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Birch, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dickinson, M. H.

Force production and flow structure of the leading edge vortex on flapping wings at high and low Reynolds numbers

James M. Birch*, William B. Dickson{dagger} and Michael H. Dickinson{dagger},{ddagger}

Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA



View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Comparison of translational force coefficients at Re=120 and Re=1400. (A) We rapidly accelerated the wing from rest to a constant tip velocity of 0.26 m s–1. The angle of attack (AOA) was increased between trials in 10° increments. Labels to the right of the forces in the first panel indicate angles of attack. At both Re, an initial transient peak was followed by stable force generation. (B) Coefficients of lift (CL) and drag (CD) averaged between the broken lines in A. The polars form two concentric arcs with values measured at high Re around the outermost arc. (C) Net force coefficients increase with angle of attack, with greater increases at high Re. (D) The angle of the net force vector quickly reaches 90°, indicating pressure forces dominate at both low and high Re.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Vorticity measurements at both Re. (A) Side views of wing at 0.65R (R is the length of one wing) at mid-downstroke. Wing is moving to the left at an angle of attack of 45°. Note the stronger and larger leading edge vortex at the higher Re. (B) Circulation around the wing as a function of wing length. The vertical line at 0.65R represents the position of the pseudocolor plots in A. The area of greatest vorticity shifts slightly towards the wingtip at high Re, occurring at 0.65R versus 0.49R at low Re.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Calculated circulation and subsequent force. (A) Although measurements were made during separate digital particle image velocimetry (DPIV) experiments, spanwise ({Gamma}z) and chordwise ({Gamma}x) circulation show similar strength profiles along the wing. (B) Using values for spanwise vorticity ({omega}z) in the Kutta–Zhukovski equation, sectional lift values at both Re are maximum near 0.65R, with high Re generating more lift along the outer third of the wing.

 


View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The magnitude and distribution of axial flow is dependent on Re. The top schematic shows the position of the three side view panels (0.45R, 0.55R and 0.65R) at each Re. Flows are captured from a wing at mid-downstroke starting from rest. Columns 1 and 3 show the sectional velocity field as arrows (uy and ux) superimposed over a pseudo-color plot of axial velocity (uz). Next to each column are plotted the ux and uz values along the gray broken transect from A to B shown in i. The left two columns show flow at low Re. Note how the maximum axial flow (uz) at low Re occurs farther behind the vortex center than at high Re. Also, at high Re, flow near the leading edge is much more complicated, with a stronger axial flow component.

 


View larger version (63K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Vorticity and velocity when viewed from behind. Color represents vorticity, arrows represent velocity (arrow scale upper right). Panels i–iv show successive slices starting just behind the leading edge (i) and moving toward the trailing edge in 1 cm increments (see inset at top). The solid horizontal line indicates the laser sheet intersection with the wing; vectors above this line are above and behind the wing, vectors below represent fluid movement as seen through the wing (i.e. below and in front of the wing). Columns (A–D and E–H) represent two experimental protocols with identical wing size, flapping frequency and kinematic pattern; only oil viscosity and Re are different.

 


View larger version (85K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Velocity vectors from the rear at Re~1400. These slices were captured in an identical fashion to those in Fig. 5 except that they were spaced every 0.5 cm with the camera closer to the wing. The wing tip is to the left, the leading edge (top) is into the page, the trailing edge (bottom) is out of the page, and the wing is sweeping away from the viewer and is caught during mid-downstroke. Note the localized high velocity movement of fluid in A and B, possibly representing the front edge of the spiral vortex. By E, the laser sheet is capturing the rear of the spiraling leading edge vortex.

 


View larger version (83K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Photographs near mid-downstroke using bubble rake. Left column (A,B) at Re=120. Right column (C,D) at Re=1400. Full wing views (A,C) taken at approximately mid-downstroke when wing is parallel to camera. Close-ups of the leading edge (B,D) show the growth of flow within the core of the leading edge vortex. Note the lack of a tight helix at low Re (B).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2004