First published online May 1, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 1837-1847 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02201
A new set of laboratory-selected Drosophila melanogaster lines for the analysis of desiccation resistance: response to selection, physiology and correlated responses
Marina Telonis-Scott*,
Kathryn M. Guthridge and
Ary A. Hoffmann
Centre for Environmental Stress Adaptation Research, La Trobe
University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Survival curve of the two selected and control lines (shown as average
percentage survival per hour) when stressed, in groups of 10. (A) Females
(filled markers); (B) males (open markers).
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2 (A) Egg to adult development time (25°C). Ten eggs were placed in vials
and scored at 6-h intervals until all flies had eclosed. Open bars indicate
females, while filled bars represent males. The error bars are standard errors
around the mean of 20 replicates. (B) Early fecundity. Patterns of early
fecundity were observed in pairs of 01-day-old flies, where egg
production within a 24 h period was recorded at the same time daily for 5 days
and was assessed as the mean number of eggs produced in total per line. The
error bars are standard errors around the mean of 1518 replicate
pairs.
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Correlated stress responses. (A) Starvation resistance scored every 8 h
until 50% mortality, with error bars as standard errors around the mean of
three replicates of 10 females. (B) Cold mortality at 2°C for 2.5
h, average mortality after 24 h, with error bars as standard errors around the
mean of 13 replicates of 10 females.
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Average desiccation resistance of the eight F2 genotypes
(females tested) generated from the crosses described in the Materials and
methods.
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2006