First published online June 11, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 2025-2032 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.000315
Novel landmark-guided routes in ants
T. S. Collett*,
P. Graham and
R. A. Harris
University of Sussex, School of Biological Sciences, Biology
Building, Brighton, Sussex, BN1 9QG, UK

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig 1. Novel routes of wood ants (Formica rufa) to a food site. Ant
trajectories are shown from displaced (D1, D2, D3) and training (T) start
points. Solid black circles indicate cylinders, and F indicates the food site.
Food was removed during these tests [adapted from Durier et al.
(Durier et al., 2004 )].
|
|

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Novel route of wood ants (Formica rufa) to a food site. (A) Food
was placed at the base of a gradient landmark. (B) The mean path along the
habitual route and the mean path from a displaced start point are shown as a
grey ribbon whose width represents the 95% confidence interval of the mean
path. N is the number of ants trained and tested, and n is
the number of recorded trajectories (T.S.C., P.G. and R.A.H., unpublished
data). Line superimposed on the grey ribbon shows the path predicted by the
`look-up' model described in the text and in more detail in Harris et al.
(Harris et al., 2007 ). The
paths of the displaced ants and the model do not quite reach the goal. This
error is probably caused by the foreshortening of the wall, when seen from an
acute angle. Discrepancies between data and model are partly because the ant
may switch to a second strategy when it is close to the landmark and becomes
unable to assess the overall width of the gradient and partly because of
inaccuracies in the model's simulation of the gradient width perceived by the
ant.
|
|

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Homeward routes of wood ants (Formica japonica) from a feeder and
after displacement. (A) Map of site showing positions of trees behind the nest
relative to the terrace. N marks the nest, F the food site and R one of the
displaced release sites. B and C show the routes of full- and zero-vector
ants, respectively. Inset shows mean directions of the initial part of the
trajectories, with B extended in A to indicate the point of convergence.
Trajectories from the food site (B) and close to the food site (C) are shown
as solid lines. Trajectories from the displaced sites are shown as broken
lines [adapted from Fukushi and Wehner
(Fukushi and Wehner,
2004 )].
|
|

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Homing routes in Melophorus bagoti after displacement. A and B
show the routes of full- and zero-vector ants, respectively, that have been
displaced 10 m from the food site. Ants reach the nest in both cases but they
take different routes, and the paths of zero-vector ants tend to be more
convoluted. N marks the nest, F the food site and R the release site [adapted
from Narendra (Narendra,
2007b )].
|
|

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Homing in Cataglyphis fortis. Location of nest (N), feeding site
(F) and release points (R) within bushy, desert terrain. Ants that had
returned from F to N were displaced from N and released at sites R and F and
their paths recorded for 15 min or until they reached within 2 m of N [adapted
from Wehner et al. (Wehner et al.,
1996 )].
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007