spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online June 11, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 2163-2169 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02789
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruther, J.
Right arrow Articles by Tolasch, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruther, J.
Right arrow Articles by Tolasch, T.

A male sex pheromone in a parasitic wasp and control of the behavioral response by the female's mating status

Joachim Ruther1,*, Lina M. Stahl1, Sven Steiner1, Leif A. Garbe2 and Till Tolasch3

1 Institut für Biologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Haderslebener Str. 9, D-12163 Berlin, Germany
2 Institut für Biotechnologie, Technische Universität Berlin, Seestraße 13, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
3 Tierökologie 220c, Universität Hohenheim, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany


Figure 1
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Total ion current chromatograms of dichloromethane extracts from (A) male and (B) female N. vitripennis using a non-polar DB-5 ms capillary column. The arrow indicates the male-specific double peak of diastereomers of 5-hydroxy-4-decanolide. IS, internal standard (50 ng methyl undecanoate).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Separation of synthetic threo- and erythro-enantiomers of 5-hydroxy-4-decanolide (HDL) on a chiral ß-DEX 225 GC column. Extracts from N. vitripennis males contained (4R,5R)- and (4R,5S)-HDL.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Amounts (mean ± s.e.m.) of 5-hydroxy-4-decanolide in whole body extracts from N. vitripennis males of various age (different lower- and uppercase letters indicate significant differences for each diastereomer at P<0.05, one-way ANOVA and LSD test).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Release dynamics of 5-hydroxy-4-decanolide (total amounts) by N. vitripennis males during a 5-h sampling period (N=10). Each bar diagram represents the results from one individual male. Amounts released per hour are presented as the percentage of the total amount released in 5 h. Volatile sampling was performed during the photophase between 10:00 h and 18:00 h.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Residence time (mean ± s.e.m.) of N. vitripennis females and males in odor and control fields of a two-choice olfactometer. Females were either virgin or mated and tested 5 min, 24 h or 6 days after copulation. The 6-day ones had the opportunity to oviposit. Tested males had no copulation experience. Odor fields were treated with (A) one male equivalent (eq.) of natural 5-hydroxy-4-decanolide (HDL; experiment 1), or (B) synthetic (4R,5R)- and (4R,5S)-HDL (ratio 1:1.3) at doses of 80 or 160 ng (experiment 2). Control fields were treated with the pure solvent. Asterisks indicate significant differences (*P<0.05, ***P<0.001); NS, not significant (t-test for dependent samples, N=20).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (4K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Mean residence time of virgin females in test and control fields of a two-choice olfactometer. Test fields were treated with (4R,5R)- or (4S,5S)-5-hydroxy-4-decanolide (HDL) at doses of 80 ng (experiment 3). Control fields were treated with the pure solvent. ***Significant differences at P<0.001 (t-test for dependent samples, N=20).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007