spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online November 2, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 3931-3939 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.009548
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drewes, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Withers, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drewes, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Withers, P. C.

Unique role of skeletal muscle contraction in vertical lymph movement in anurans

Robert C. Drewes1,*, Michael S. Hedrick2, Stanley S. Hillman3 and Philip C. Withers4

1 Department of Herpetology, California Academy of Sciences, 825 Howard Street, San Francisco, CA 94013, USA
2 Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, East Bay, Hayward, CA 94542, USA
3 Department of Biology, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97207-0751, USA
4 Zoology, School of Animal Biology MO92, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia


Figure 1
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Stylized models representative of morphological differences in the skeletal muscle presented in this work. (A,B) Chaunus marinus; (C,D) Lithobates catesbeiana. A and C represent ventral views; B and D represent posterior views. Key: A, abdominal crenator; G, gracilis minor; T, tensor fascia latae; P, piriformis; S, sphincter ani cloacalis; CP, cutaneous pectoris; CD, cutaneous dorsi.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Representative traces of the synchrony between integrated EMG activity of the skeletal muscles indicated and their synchrony with pressure changes in the lymphatic sacs in (A) C. marinus and (B) L. catesbeiana.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Examples of correlation between EMG activity in M. piriformis and impedance change between the urostyle and cloaca in (A) C. marinus and (B) L. catesbeiana.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Pattern of pressure change in the pubic sac during a contractile event. Two examples of the types of pressure changes recorded from lymph sacs. The first event illustrates a `decrease only' pattern while the second event illustrates the more common `biphasic' increase/decrease pressure pattern. Pressure before (Ppre) and following (Ppost) the pressure event (shaded area; {Delta}P) are shown (see text).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (5K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Frequencies of varying patterns of pressure change for the (A) interfemoral and (B) pubic lymph sacs of C. marinus. The majority of pressure events are `biphasic' [increase (+)/decrease (–)] compared with increase-only (+) or decrease-only (–). Values are means ± s.e.m.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Correlation between the mean event pressure ({Delta}P) and the net change (PprePpost) for the intermuscular, iliac, interfemoral and pubic lymph sacs of C. marinus.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007