First published online November 30, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 4345-4350 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.007294
Energy availability influences microclimate selection of hibernating bats
Justin G. Boyles1,*,
Miranda B. Dunbar2,
Jonathan J. Storm3 and
Virgil Brack, Jr1
1 Center for North American Bat Research and Conservation, Department of
Ecology and Organismal Biology, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN
47809, USA
2 Department of Biology, University of Regina, Saskatchewan, S4S 0A2,
Canada
3 Department of Ecology and Organismal Biology, Indiana State University,
Terre Haute, IN 47809, USA

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Thermal gradient apparatus used to test the thermal preference of
hibernating big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus.
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Body mass of little brown myotis, Myotis lucifugus, in an
abandoned limestone mine in western Ohio on three dates during winter
2006–2007. Each pair of box-plots represents the mass of bats weighed in
two sections of the mine, a cold section near the front of the mine (C) and a
warmer section deeper in the mine (W). Sample sizes are under the box-plot. In
all samples, bats from the warmer section were larger than those from the
colder section. Significance level of one-tailed t-tests indicated
by: *P<0.05; **P<0.01.
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007