spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online December 14, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 9-14 (2008)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2008
doi: 10.1242/jeb.012823
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Genzel, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wiegrebe, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Genzel, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wiegrebe, L.

Time-variant spectral peak and notch detection in echolocation-call sequences in bats

Daria Genzel* and Lutz Wiegrebe

Department of Biologie II, Universität München, Großhadernerstr. 2 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany


Figure 1
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Spectrograms of the echolocation-call sequences with the time-variant peaks (A,B) and notches (C,D). To the left of A and C is the spectrogram of the unfiltered FM sweep consisting of F0 (23 to 19 kHz) and four harmonics with a duration of 1.5 ms. A and B show the echolocation-call sequences to be discriminated for the time-variant peak detection. C and D show the echolocation-call sequences to be discriminated for the time-variant notch detection. All echolocation-call sequences have a modulation depth of 40% of the centre frequency (CF) and a modulation rate of 16 Hz, which results in an overall duration of 125 ms.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. (A–D) Mean psychometric functions for all bats for the time-variant peak detection for the tested modulation rates (MR) of 2, 4, 8 and 16 Hz, respectively. Plotted are percent correct decisions as a function of the modulation depths; the significant threshold level was set to 75%. Each panel depicts the psychometrics curves for all animals as a function of modulation depth. The threshold is calculated as a mean value for all bats.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Psychometric functions for the time-variant peak detection for one bat for the modulation rate (MR) of 4 Hz. The solid line represents the performance with an initial training at a modulation depth of 40% of centre frequency (CF). The dotted line displays the same bat's performance for the same experimental condition, only with an initial training at a modulation depth of 100% of CF.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. (A–D) Mean psychometric functions for all bats for the time-variant notch detection for the tested modulation rates (MR). Data are shown in the same format as in Fig. 2.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2008