|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online January 19, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 399-406 (2006)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2006
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02001
Rapid cold-hardening increases the freezing tolerance of the Antarctic midge Belgica antarctica
1 Department of Zoology, Miami University, Oxford OH 45056, USA
2 Department of Entomology, Ohio State University, 318 W. 12th Avenue,
Columbus, OH 43210, USA
3 School of Biological Sciences, Liverpool University, Crown Street,
Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: leere{at}muohio.edu)
Accepted 16 November 2005
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: rapid cold-hardening, freezing tolerance, Chironomidae, Belgica antarctica
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The distribution of the terrestrial chironomid Belgica antarctica
extends further south than any other free-living holometabolous insect and,
since Antarctic vertebrates are essentially marine, it is the largest
terrestrial animal in Antarctica (Usher
and Edwards, 1984
; Sugg et
al., 1983
). This endemic species is sporadically dispersed, though
locally abundant, on the west coast of the Antarctic Peninsula and its
islands. Detailed accounts of the life history and ecology of B.
antarctica are provided by Convey and Block
(1996
), Sugg et al.
(1983
), Usher and Edwards
(1984
) and references cited
therein. Briefly, its two-year life cycle includes four larval stages, and
overwintering may occur in any instar. Larvae feed on moss, terrestrial algae,
particularly Prasiola crispa, plant and animal detritus and
microorganisms. Pupation and adult emergence occur in spring and summer. Like
many insects living in wind-swept alpine and oceanic habitats, the adults are
wingless. Adults live for fewer than 10 days. Like the male swarms of winged
midges in temperate and arctic regions, mating occurs in aggregations of
flightless males. Females mate within one day of eclosion and lay several
clusters of eggs within 1-2 days.
Although ambient air temperatures may reach winter lows of -40°C on
Anvers Island, B. antarctica survives freezing to only -15°C
(Baust and Lee, 1981
), a
relatively modest level of cold tolerance compared with many alpine and polar
insects. Thermal buffering within its microhabitat explains this apparent
anomaly; at 1 cm depth, substrate temperatures remain between 0 and -2°C
for more than 300 days of the year, rarely decreasing to -7°C
(Baust and Lee, 1981
).
Buffering may be provided by more than 1 m of ice and snow that covers the
hibernacula of overwintering larvae; thermal conditions on small islands and
peninsulas are further ameliorated by surrounding seawater, where annual
temperatures remain between 0 and -1.8°C
(Baust, 1980
;
Baust and Lee, 1981
). Unlike
most temperate insects that markedly increase their cold tolerance in
preparation for winter, B. antarctica retains its modest levels of
freeze tolerance all year round. Larvae are sensitive to thermal stress and
die within a week of exposure to 10°C
(Baust and Lee, 1987
).
Despite residing in a thermally buffered winter microenvironment, larvae
experience highly variable and often unpredictable conditions during the
summer. Accordingly, several recent studies have examined the potential for
RCH in Antarctic arthropods (Worland et
al., 2000
; Worland and Convey,
2001
; Sinclair et al.,
2003b
; Sinclair and Chown,
2003
). In the present study, we test whether RCH can occur in
larvae and adults of B. antarctica that were field collected in the
summer or in larvae after cold acclimation in the laboratory. We report that
RCH enhances freeze tolerance in this species, thus extending the role of RCH
beyond chilling injury to include protection against freezing injury.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Samples of substrate containing larvae were shipped frozen (approximately
-5°C for 7 days) to Miami University and subsequently stored at 4°C.
These `cold-acclimated' larvae were hand picked from the substrate in ice-cold
water and stored at 4°C, 0 h:24 h L:D in water for 24 h to allow clearance
of the gut (mean gut clearance
6 h;
Baust and Edwards, 1979
) prior
to experimental use.
Supercooling point, water content and osmolality determinations
For supercooling point determinations, larvae were blotted dry with
absorbent tissue and single individuals were placed in direct contact with a
thermocouple and cooled from 4 to -25°C at a rate of 1 deg.
min-1. The supercooling point was taken as the lowest temperature
reached prior to the release of the latent heat of fusion as the result of
freezing of the body water. Water content of individual larvae was assessed
gravimetrically from measurement of fresh mass (to nearest 0.01 mg) at the
time of sampling and dry mass after drying to constant mass at 65°C.
Hemolymph osmolality was determined using a vapor pressure depression
technique (Holmstrup and Sømme,
1998
). Groups of 5-10 larvae were placed in a sample holder and
quickly crushed with a TeflonTM rod to expose the body fluids. The sample
was then allowed to equilibrate for 30 minfollowing placement within a C-52
sample chamber (Wescor Inc., Logan, UT, USA). The osmolality of the sample was
measured using a Wescor HR 33T Dew Point Microvoltometer operated in the dew
point mode.
Whole-animal survival
Groups of 10 larvae were placed in 1.8 ml capped microcentrifuge tubes with
50-80 µl ddH2O. Adult temperature exposures were conducted
in `dry' tubes (i.e. containing no water). Microcentrifuge tubes containing
larvae or adults were transferred from 4°C to refrigerated baths and
directly exposed to -10, -15 or -20°C for 1 or 24 h. Individuals in the
RCH group were held at -5°C for 1 h prior to direct transfer to the test
temperature. During RCH, water in the tubes containing larvae was frozen at
-5°C, suggesting that larvae, as result of their high susceptibility to
inoculative freezing (M.A.E. and R.E.L., unpublished), were frozen
inoculatively. Survival was assessed following a 24 h recovery at 4°C, as
indicated by the larva's ability to move either spontaneously or in response
to gentle prodding. Three to six replicates were run per sample.
Low-temperature exposures were also conducted with larvae cooled in dry
microcentrifuge tubes. Larvae were blotted with absorbent tissues before
placement in the microcentrifuge tubes. Water (
50-80 µl) was added to
dry tubes containing larvae immediately after removal from the temperature
treatment to prevent desiccation during recovery. Survival was assessed as
above. Data from these dry treatments did not differ significantly
(P>0.05) from those containing water, thus only the results of
`wet' treatments are presented.
Cellular survival
Cold-acclimated larvae were divided into three groups: controls (maintained
at 4°C), frozen directly (exposed to -20°C for 24 h) and rapidly
cold-hardened (exposed to -5°C for 1 h prior to 24 h freezing at
-20°C). Larvae were cooled in dry microcentrifuge tubes. Larvae in the RCH
group were cooled individually in contact with thermocouples. Cellular
survival of larvae frozen, as noted by the presence of an exotherm, during RCH
did not differ (P>0.05) from larvae that remained supercooled at
-5°C; therefore cellular survival is reported only for larvae frozen
during the RCH treatment, to correspond to whole-animal RCH trials as
described above.
Following a 24 h thaw at 4°C, groups of three larvae were dissected to
assess cellular survival of several tissue types (fat body, gut, Malpighian
tubules and salivary gland). Tissues were dissected in Coast's solution
(Coast, 1988
) and cellular
survival was assessed using the LIVE/DEAD sperm viability kit (Molecular
Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) as modified by Yi and Lee
(2003
). Living cells with
intact cell membranes fluoresced green or yellow-green, while red or
orange-red fluorescence indicated dead cells. For fat body and gut, mean
values of cellular survival are based on counts of three groups of 100 cells
for each of the three replicates. Because the Malpighian tubules and salivary
glands are composed of fewer cells, all visible cells were scored as either
alive or dead in each of three replicates.
Statistical analysis
Means were compared, following tests for parametric assumptions, using
Student's t-tests or analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni-Dunn
tests (Statview from SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Survival data were
arcsin-square root transformed prior to analysis. Data are presented as means
± s.e.m. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
7 days, significantly
(P<0.05) increased the larval supercooling point to -6.6°C
(Table 1). However, cold
acclimation was apparently not associated with increased cryoprotectant
synthesis, as hemolymph osmolality was unchanged. Similarly, larval water
content did not change significantly following cold acclimation.
|
Rapid cold-hardening: whole-animal freeze tolerance
Nearly all summer-acclimatized larvae (98.3±1.7%) survived freezing
at -5°C for 1 h (Fig. 2A),
but survival fell to <25% following freezing at -10°C for 1 h. RCH, in
which larvae were frozen at -5°C for 1 h, significantly
(P<0.05) increased the freezing tolerance of summer-acclimatized
larvae following freezing at -10°C
(Fig. 2A). Survival increased
by 67.7% following RCH relative to larvae receiving no treatment prior to
freezing. By contrast, summer-acclimatized adults lacked the capacity to
undergo RCH (Fig. 2B): no
individuals survived following RCH and exposure at -10°C for 1 h.
|
By contrast, cold-acclimated larvae were extremely tolerant of freezing at -10°C for 24 h (>97% survival; Fig. 3). However, only 42% of the cold-acclimated larvae survived freezing at -15°C for 24 h, and no larvae survived freezing at -20°C. Survival was significantly (P<0.05) greater following RCH: nearly 90% and 75% of the cold-acclimated larvae survived freezing at -15 and -20°C, respectively (Fig. 3). Among the individuals that survived freezing at -15°C, RCH larvae appeared much more active and mobile than those cold-acclimated larvae that survived but received no treatment prior to freezing. Larvae that survived freezing at -20°C displayed only limited motility, suggesting some degree of freezing injury.
|
Cold-hardening is often accompanied by the synthesis of low-molecular-mass cryoprotectants, resulting in an increase in solute concentration that can be measured as an increase in hemolymph osmolality and depression of the supercooling point. No change was detected in either hemolymph osmolality or the supercooling point in response to RCH (Table 1). These observations suggest that additional cryoprotectants were not synthesized in response to RCH.
Rapid cold-hardening: cellular survival
Fat body, gut, Malpighian tubules and salivary gland sampled from control,
cold-acclimated larvae maintained at 4°C had >97% cellular survival
(Table 2). Cells of all tissue
types from control larvae appeared healthy with intact cell membranes, as
indicated by the observation that the vast majority of cells were stained by
the membrane permeant SYBR-14 (green nuclei) while the dead-cell stain
propidium iodide (red nuclei) was excluded
(Fig. 4).
|
|
Cellular survival of fat body, gut and Malpighian tubules was significantly (P<0.05) lower than in the controls following larval freezing at -20°C for 24 h (Table 2; Fig. 4). Fat body cells were particularly susceptible to the freezing stress, as survival was reduced by 96% relative to controls; fat body cells incurred substantial damage to cell membranes, as nuclei were stained by propidium iodide (Fig. 4), and appeared more diffuse and loosely arranged compared with tissues from control larvae maintained at 4°C. Similarly, cellular survival of the gut and Malpighian tubules was reduced by 53 and 35%, respectively, following freezing. By contrast, survival of the salivary gland did not differ significantly relative to tissue from control larvae (Table 2; Fig. 4). Collectively, freezing of cold-acclimated larvae at -20°C with no prior treatment resulted in a decrease in cell survival of 47% relative to control larvae maintained at 4°C.
RCH larvae frozen at -5°C for 1 h prior to freezing at -20°C exhibited significantly (P<0.05) higher rates of cell survival for fat body, gut and Malpighian tubules relative to tissues from cold-acclimated larvae directly frozen at -20°C (Table 2). RCH increased cellular survival of fat body dramatically, by 48%, relative to larvae frozen with no prior treatment. While the majority of fat body cells maintained intact cell membranes, localized areas of higher cell mortality were present (Fig. 4). Similarly, RCH increased cell survival of gut and Malpighian tubules 31 and 18%, respectively. Survival of salivary gland from RCH larvae did not differ significantly from larvae frozen with no prior treatment or control larvae maintained at 4°C (Fig. 4). Combining survival for all tissues, RCH resulted in a 24% increase in cell survival relative to larvae frozen at -20°C with no prior treatment.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cold acclimation of frozen larvae increases freeze tolerance and the supercooling point
Few summer-acclimatized larvae (<20%) survived 24 h at -10°C, while
none survived -15°C (Fig.
1). By contrast, following 7 days of subzero cold acclimation,
nearly all larvae survived -10°C and >40% survived -15°C. This
increase is particularly remarkable because larvae were frozen at temperatures
between -10 and -5°C during the 7-day acclimation period.
Previous reports have documented changes in frozen insects including
mitochondrial structure, metabolite and cryoprotectant levels, and diapause
status. Acclimation of frozen caterpillars of Gynaephora groenlandica
at -15°C caused a reduction of the number of mitochondria and disruption
of cristae in remaining mitochondria
(Kukal et al., 1989
). Changes
in glycerol levels, energy charge and enzyme activity are reported from frozen
larval and adult insects (Baust,
1972
; Storey et al.,
1981
; Storey and Storey,
1981
; Kukal et al.,
1988
). Irwin et al.
(2001
) demonstrated that
diapause development occurs in fly larvae frozen at -20°C. In the present
study, cold acclimation of frozen B. antarctica larvae markedly
increased insect cold tolerance by decreasing the lower lethal temperature.
This increase in freezing tolerance was apparently not caused by accumulation
of cryoprotectants, since there was no increase in hemolymph osmolality
(Table 1).
Subzero acclimation increased supercooling point values (-8.6°C) for
summer-acclimatized larvae by 2° (Table
1). This elevation is consistent with previous reports for this
species during the transition from summer to autumn. Between early February
and the end of March, Lee and Baust
(1981
) reported an increase in
the supercooling point from -10.2°C to -5.0°C; this change was closely
correlated with decreasing microhabitat temperatures from 11.2°C to
0.8°C during this period. Similarly, a mean value of -6.2°C was
reported for B. antarctica larvae collected in early April
(Block, 1982
). This trend
suggests the seasonal production of endogenous ice nucleators, frequently
found in freeze-tolerant insects, that function to promote protective freezing
at high subzero temperatures (Zachariassen
and Hammel, 1976
; Baust and
Edwards, 1979
; Lee and
Costanzo, 1998
).
RCH at subzero temperatures increases freezing tolerance
Cold tolerance in Antarctic and sub-Antarctic terrestrial arthropods,
particularly Collembola and mites, has been studied extensively over the past
25 years (see reviews by Somme and Block, 1982; Convey,
1996
,
1997
;
Sinclair et al., 2003a
). Most
insects in these regions are freezing intolerant, surviving subzero exposure
by extensive supercooling of their body fluids; their lower lethal limit is
usually defined by their supercooling point. Since these species are not
susceptible to nonfreezing, chilling or cold shock injury, it is not
surprising that rapid cold-hardening, sensu stricto as it was
originally defined (Lee et al.,
1987
), has not been reported for Antarctic regions.
Traditionally, acclimation temperatures in the range of 0 to 6°C have
been used to induce the RCH response (cf.
Burks and Hagstrum, 1999
;
Coulson and Bale, 1990
;
Czajka and Lee, 1990
;
Koveos, 2001
; Larson and Lee,
1994; Lee et al., 1987
). This
response can also be induced using slow rates of cooling or thermoperiods that
mimic natural diurnal cycles (Kelty and Lee,
1999
,
2001
). Although acclimation at
subzero temperatures has been reported rarely, Worland and Convey
(2001
) found a decrease in
supercooling point values for a freeze-intolerant Antarctic springtail that
was acclimated for 12 h at -2°C; however, acclimation at -5°C had no
effect in this species. Similarly, Brown et al.
(2004
) reported a significant
reduction of supercooling point values of larvae of the hoverfly Syrphus
ribesiii following repeated subzero exposures. However, these larvae also
displayed reduced freeze tolerance. To our knowledge, the -5°C that was
used in the present study is the lowest temperature at which the RCH response
has been induced.
In contrast to summer-acclimatized larvae, the freeze-intolerant adults did
not undergo RCH (Fig. 2). Lack
of the RCH response is, perhaps, not surprising for several reasons. Adults
have a significant level of intrinsic cold tolerance as evidenced by the fact
that a substantial number survived 24 h of exposure to -5°C
(Fig. 1). Adults only live for
a few days, emerging on warm, sunny days to mate and lay eggs
(Sugg et al., 1983
).
Furthermore, the wingless adults are far more mobile than larvae and remain in
or near thermally buffered microhabitats to which they could retreat during a
cold spell.
Diversity in types of short-term cold-hardening responses
The original report on the RCH response described the swift acquisition of
protection against chilling or cold shock injury, also called prefreeze
mortality because it occurs at temperatures above the supercooling point and
is not related to freezing of body fluids
(Lee et al., 1987
). Although
this response is now well known in a range of insect orders and in the Acarina
in temperate regions, the RCH response, according to the original definition,
has not been found in Antarctic terrestrial arthropods
(Worland and Convey, 2001
;
Sinclair et al., 2003b
).
Nonetheless, other types of cold-hardening that occur over short time
periods have been reported for Antarctic microarthropods. Supercooling points
of the springtail Cryptopygus antarcticus track microhabitat
temperatures that can result in significant changes in cold-hardiness within
12 h (Worland et al., 2000
;
Worland and Convey, 2001
). For
this species, and most other Antarctic mites and springtails, the supercooling
point corresponds to the lower lethal temperature
(Block and Somme, 1982
; Somme
and Block, 1982). Since no mortality occurs until the organism freezes at its
supercooling point, this type of hardening differs from the RCH response, as
originally defined, that protects against nonfreezing chilling injury.
Similarly, diurnal variation in the supercooling points of other species of
Antarctic Collembola indicates that cold tolerance can vary within hours
(Sinclair et al., 2003b
).
Only a minority of terrestrial arthropods are tolerant of freezing, and
such species are especially rare in the sub-Antarctic region
(Chown and Nicolson, 2004
;
Sinclair et al., 2003a
). A
notable exception to this pattern is caterpillars of Pringleophaga
marioni, which survive freezing at high subzero temperatures
(Klok and Chown, 1997
;
Sinclair and Chown, 2003
).
Both desiccation and high-temperature pre-treatments enhance freezing
tolerance in this species; however, a variety of low temperature treatments,
selected specifically to test for the presence of a RCH response, yielded no
evidence for such a response (Sinclair and
Chown, 2003
). To our knowledge, the capacity for RCH in B.
antarctica larvae described herein is the first for any freeze-tolerant
insect.
RCH at the cellular level
Cold-hardening at the organismal level was paralleled at the cellular
level, as RCH dramatically increased cellular survival of several tissue types
in larvae of B. antarctica following freezing. When the RCH response
was induced by exposing cold-acclimated larvae to -5°C for 1 h, cellular
survival of Malpighian tubules and gut was
18 and 31% higher,
respectively, than tissues from larvae directly exposed to -20°C. An even
greater increase was observed in survival of fat body cells: survival
increased by 48% following RCH. A similar magnitude of increase in cellular
survival of cold shock was seen following in vivo RCH of selected
tissues from the flesh fly Sarcophaga crassipalpis
(Yi and Lee, 2004
). Yi and Lee
(2004
) also demonstrated that
the RCH response was independent of the central nervous system and
neuroendocrine control. It is now clear that the RCH response observed at the
organismal level is likewise operant at the cellular level and may afford
protection against both non-freezing cold shock and freezing injury. In the
case of B. antarctica, RCH may be especially important for cellular
protection during unpredictable summer cold, when freezing may occur.
While gut, Malpighian tubules and salivary gland displayed substantially
higher cellular survival, the fate of the fat body paralleled larval survival
in being extremely susceptible to freezing, with <3% of cells surviving at
-20°C. A similar pattern of cell survival was documented in the
freeze-tolerant alpine cockroach Celatoblatta quinquemaculata
(Worland et al., 2004
).
Following freezing to -12°C, no adult cockroaches survived, and cell
survival of fat body declined to <10%. This contrasts the survival
following freezing of fat body cells of the goldenrod gall fly, Eurosta
solidaginis (Lee et al.,
1993
). While no larvae survived to adulthood, >60% of fat body
cells survived following intracellular freezing at -80°C. Similarly, no
larvae of the freeze-tolerant dipteran Heliomyza borealis survived
freezing at -40°C, while >80% of fat body cells survived
(Morton-Firth et al., 1996
).
This indicates, at least in E. solidaginis and H. borealis,
that the freeze tolerance of fat body cells could not explain the lower limit
of larval freeze tolerance, but this was not the case for B.
antarctica. We assume that the most vulnerable tissue ultimately limits
cold tolerance of the whole organism, and for B. antarctica the most
vulnerable tissue may indeed be the fat body.
Mechanism of rapid cold-hardening
The physiological mechanism of the RCH response remains poorly understood.
Adults of S. crassipalpis increase hemolymph levels of the
cryoprotectant glycerol threefold, to
80 mmol l-1, during RCH
(Chen et al., 1987
). While
elevation of hemolymph glycerol may afford some protection against cold shock
injury in S. crassipalpis, cryoprotectant synthesis clearly is not
requisite for the RCH response, as adult Drosophila melanogaster do
not synthesize carbohydrate cryoprotectants during RCH
(Kelty and Lee, 2001
).
Similarly, no change in supercooling point or hemolymph solute concentration,
suggestive of no increase in cryoprotectant synthesis, was observed for B.
antarctica following RCH. Also, it is unlikely that the RCH response
requires the synthesis of a new suite of proteins, as Misener et al.
(2001
) found that inhibition
of protein synthesis did not inhibit RCH. Changes in the lipid composition of
cell membranes may be involved in the RCH response
(Overgaard et al., 2005
), and
such `homeoviscous adaptations' could maintain cell membrane integrity when
the cell is confronted with low temperatures and/or the stresses associated
with ice formation within the body fluids
(Hazel, 1995
;
Hazel and Williams, 1990
),
but, clearly, further experiments are needed to define the mechanisms
responsible for the widely used RCH response.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Baust, J. G. (1972). Insect freezing protection in Pterostichus brevicornis (Carabidae). Nature 236,219 -220.[CrossRef]
Baust, J. G. (1980). Low temperature tolerance in an Antarctic insect: a relict adaptation? CryoLetters 1,360 -371.
Baust, J. G. and Edwards, J. S. (1979). Mechanisms of freezing tolerance in an Antarctic midge, Belgica antarctica. Physiol. Entomol. 4, 1-5.
Baust, J. G. and Lee, R. E. (1981). Environmental "homeothermy" in an Antarctic insect. Antarct. J. US 15,170 -172.
Baust, J. G. and Lee, R. E. (1987). Multiple stress tolerance in an Antarctic terrestrial arthropod: Belgica antarctica. Cryobiology 24,140 -147.
Block, W. (1982). Supercooling points of insects and mites on the Antarctic Peninsula. Ecol. Entomol. 7,1 -8.
Block, W. and Sømme, L. (1982). Cold hardiness of terrestrial mites at Signy Island, maritime Antarctic. Oikos 38,157 -167.
Brown, C. L., Bale, J. S. and Walters, K. F. A. (2004). Freezing induces a loss of freeze tolerance in an overwintering insect. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271,1507 -1511.[Medline]
Burks, C. S. and Hagstrum, D. W. (1999). Rapid cold-hardening capacity in five species of coleopteran pests of stored grain. J. Stored Prod. Res. 35,65 -75.[CrossRef]
Chen, C. P., Denlinger, D. L. and Lee, R. E. (1987). Cold-shock injury and rapid cold hardening in the flesh fly Sarcophaga crassipalpis. Physiol. Zool. 60,297 -304.
Chown, S. L. and Nicolson, S. W. (2004). Insect Physiological Ecology: Mechanisms and Patterns. New York: Oxford University Press.
Coast, G. M. (1988). Fluid secretion by single isolated Malpighian tubules of the house cricket, Acheta domesticus, and their response to diuretic hormone. Physiol. Ent. 13,381 -391.
Convey, P. (1996). Overwintering strategies of terrestrial invertebrates in Antarctica - the significance of flexibility in extremely seasonal environments. Eur. J. Entomol. 93,489 -505.
Convey, P. (1997). How are the life history strategies of Antarctic terrestrial invertebrates influenced by extreme environmental conditions? J. Therm. Biol. 22,429 -440.[CrossRef]
Convey, P. and Block, W. (1996). Antarctic Diptera: ecology, physiology and distribution. Eur. J. Entomol. 93,1 -13.
Coulson, S. J. and Bale, J. S. (1990). Characterization and limitations of the rapid-cold hardening response in the housefly Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Insect Physiol. 36,207 -211.[CrossRef]
Czajka, M. C. and Lee, R. E. (1990). A rapid
cold-hardening response protecting against cold shock injury in Drosophila
melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol.
148,245
-254.
Hazel, J. R. (1995). Thermal adaptation in biological membranes: is homeoviscous adaptation the explanation? Annu. Rev. Physiol. 57,19 -42.[Medline]
Hazel, J. R. and Williams, E. E. (1990). The role of alterations in membrane lipid composition in enabling physiological adaptation of organisms to their physical environment. Prog. Lipid Res. 29,167 -227.[CrossRef][Medline]
Holmstrup, M. and Sømme, L. (1998). Dehydration and cold hardiness in the Arctic collembolan Onychiurus arcticus Tullberg 1876. J. Comp. Physiol. B 168,197 -203.[CrossRef]
Irwin, J. B., Bennett, V. A. and Lee, R. E. (2001). Diapause development in frozen larvae of the goldenrod gall fly, Eurosta solidaginis fitch (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Comp. Physiol. B 171,181 -188.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kelty, J. D. and Lee, R. E. (1999). Induction of rapid cold hardening by cooling at ecologically relevant rates in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 45,719 -726.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kelty, J. D. and Lee, R. E. (2001). Rapid cold-hardening of Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae) during ecologically based thermoperiodic cycles. J. Exp. Biol. 204,1659 -1666.[Abstract]
Klok, C. J. and Chown, S. L. (1997). Critical thermal limits, temperature tolerance, and water balance of a sub-Antarctic caterpillar, Pringleophaga marioni (Lepidoptera: Tineidae). J. Insect Physiol. 43,685 -694.[CrossRef][Medline]
Koveos, D. S. (2001). Rapid cold hardening in the olive fruit fly Bactrocera oleae under laboratory and field conditions. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 101,257 -263.[CrossRef]
Kukal, O., Duman, J. G. and Serianni, A. S. (1988). Glycerol metabolism in a freeze-tolerant artic insect: an in vivo 13C NMR study. J. Comp. Physiol. B 158,175 -183.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kukal, O., Duman, J. G. and Serianni, A. S. (1989). Cold-induced mitochondrial degradation and cryoprotectant synthesis in freeze-tolerant arctic caterpillars. J. Comp. Physiol. B 158,661 -671.[CrossRef][Medline]
Larsen, K. J. and Lee, R. E. (1994). Cold tolerance including rapid cold-hardening and inoculative freezing in migrant monarch butterflies in Ohio. J. Insect Physiol. 40,859 -864.[CrossRef]
Lee, R. E. and Baust, J. G. (1981). Seasonal patterns of cold-hardiness in Antarctic terrestrial arthropods. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 70A,579 -582.[CrossRef]
Lee, R. E. and Costanzo, J. P. (1998). Biological ice nucleation and ice distribution in cold-hardy ectothermic animals. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 60, 55-72.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lee, R. E., Chen, C. P. and Denlinger, D. L.
(1987). A rapid cold-hardening process in insects.
Science 238,1415
-1417.
Lee, R. E., McGrath, J. J., Morason, R. T. and Taddeo, R. M. (1993). Survival of intracellular freezing, lipid coalescence and osmotic fragility in fat body cells of the freeze-tolerant gall fly Eurosta solidaginis. J. Insect Physiol. 39,445 -450.[CrossRef]
Misener, S., Chen, C. and Walker, V. K. (2001). Cold tolerance and proline metabolic gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 47,393 -400.[CrossRef][Medline]
Morton-Firth, C. J., Block, W. and Worland, M. R. (1996). Organism survival and cell integrity in a freeze-tolerant insect. CryoLetters 17,25 -30.
Overgaard, J., Sorensen, J. G., Petersen, S. O., Loeschecke, V. and Holmstrup, M. (2005). Changes in membrane lipid composition following rapid cold hardening in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 51,1173 -1182.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rinehart, J. P., Yocum, G. D. and Denlinger, D. L. (2000). Thermotolerance and rapid cold hardening ameliorate the negative effects of brief exposure to high or low temperatures on fecundity in the flesh fly, Sarcophaga crassipalpis. Physiol. Entomol. 25,330 -336.[CrossRef]
Shreve, S. M., Kelty, J. D. and Lee, R. E.
(2004). Preservation of reproductive behaviors during modest
cooling: rapid cold-hardening fine-tunes organismal response. J.
Exp. Biol. 207,1797
-1802.
Sinclair, B. J. and Chown, S. L. (2003). Rapid responses to high temperature and desiccation but not low temperature in the freeze tolerant sub-Antarctic caterpillar Pringleophaga marioni (Lepidoptera, Teneidae). J. Insect Physiol. 49, 45-52.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sinclair, B. J., Addo-Bediako, A. and Chown, S. L. (2003a). Climatic variability and the evolution of insect freeze tolerance. Biol. Rev. 78,181 -195.[Medline]
Sinclair, B. J., Klok, C. J., Scott, M. B., Terblanche, J. S. and Chown, S. L. (2003b). Diurnal variation in supercooling points of three species of Collembola from Cape Hallett, Antarctica. J. Insect Physiol. 49,1049 -1061.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sømme, L. and Block, W. (1982). Cold hardiness of Collembola at Signy Island, maritime Antarctic. Oikos 38,168 -176.[CrossRef]
Storey, K. B. and Storey, J. M. (1981). Biochemical strategies of overwintering in the gall fly larva, Eurosta solidaginis: effect of low temperature acclimation on the activities of enzymes of intermediary metabolism. J. Comp. Physiol. 144,191 -199.[CrossRef]
Storey, K. B., Baust, J. G. and Storey, J. M. (1981). Intermediary metabolism during low temperature acclimation in the overwintering gall fly larva, Eurosta solidaginis. J. Comp. Physiol. 144,183 -190.[CrossRef]
Sugg, P., Edwards, J. S. and Baust, J. (1983). Phenology and life history of Belgica antarctica, an Antarctic midge (Diptera: Chironomidae). Ecol. Entomol. 8, 105-113.
Usher, M. B. and Edwards, M. (1984). A dipteran from south of the Antarctic Circle: Belgica antarctica (Chironomidae), with a description of its larva. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 23,19 -31.
Worland, M. R. and Convey, P. (2001). Rapid cold hardening in Antarctic microarthropods. Funct. Ecol. 15,515 -524.[CrossRef]
Worland, M. R., Convey, P. and Lukesova, A. (2000). Rapid cold hardening: a gut feeling. CryoLetters 21,315 -324.[Medline]
Worland, M. R., Wharton, D. A. and Byars, S. G. (2004). Intracellular freezing and survival in the freeze tolerant alpine cockroach Celatoblatta quinquemaculata. J. Insect Physiol. 50,225 -232.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yi, S.-X. and Lee, R. E. (2003). Detecting freeze injury and seasonal cold-hardening of cells and tissues in the gall fly larvae, Eurosta solidaginis (Diptera: Tephritidae) using fluorescent vital dyes. J. Insect Physiol. 33,523 -528.
Yi, S.-X. and Lee, R. E. (2004). In vivo and in vitro rapid cold-hardening protects cells from cold-shock injury in the flesh fly. J. Comp. Physiol. B 174,611 -615.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zachariassen, K. E. and Hammel, H. T. (1976). Nucleating agents in the haemolymph of insects tolerant to freezing. Nature 262,285 -287.[CrossRef][Medline]
Related articles in JEB:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. L. Chown, J. G. Sorensen, and B. J. Sinclair Physiological variation and phenotypic plasticity: a response to `Plasticity in arthropod cryotypes' by Hawes and Bale J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2008; 211(21): 3353 - 3357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Teets, M. A. Elnitsky, J. B. Benoit, G. Lopez-Martinez, D. L. Denlinger, and R. E. Lee Jr. Rapid cold-hardening in larvae of the Antarctic midge Belgica antarctica: cellular cold-sensing and a role for calcium Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): R1938 - R1946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Elnitsky, S. A. L. Hayward, J. P. Rinehart, D. L. Denlinger, and R. E. Lee Jr Cryoprotective dehydration and the resistance to inoculative freezing in the Antarctic midge, Belgica antarctica J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2008; 211(4): 524 - 530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Hawes and J. S. Bale Plasticity in arthropod cryotypes J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2007; 210(15): 2585 - 2592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. L. Hayward, J. P. Rinehart, L. H. Sandro, R. E. Lee Jr, and D. L. Denlinger Slow dehydration promotes desiccation and freeze tolerance in the Antarctic midge Belgica antarctica J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2007; 210(5): 836 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Hawes, J. S. Bale, M. R. Worland, and P. Convey Plasticity and superplasticity in the acclimation potential of the Antarctic mite Halozetes belgicae (Michael) J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2007; 210(4): 593 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Phillips FREEZE-TOLERANCE EXTENDED BY RAPID COLD HARDENING J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2006; 209(3): ii - ii. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||