spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online March 2, 2006
Journal of Experimental Biology 209, i (2006)
Copyright © 2006 The Company of Biologists Limited
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02173
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, K.

Inside JEB

CAROTENOIDS TIP THE BALANCE FOR TIT CHICKS

Kathryn Phillips

kathryn{at}biologists.com


Figure 1

Carotenoids are potent guardians of health. With their impressive antioxidant powers they constantly protect us from the ravages of free radical damage. Most species benefit from the physiological effects of carotenoids, but while the beneficial effects of carotenoids for adult birds are relatively well established, their effects on chicks were less clear. Clotilde Biard and Anders Møller from the Université Pierre et Marie Curie, France, were intrigued by the role that carotenoids may play in wild chick development. Would blue and great tit chicks that were kept well supplied with carotenoids have a head start over nest mates on a regular diet? Biard headed out into the Forêt d'Orient to see how chicks on a carotenoid supplemented diet fared (p. 1004).

But getting access to the tiny newborns required a degree of agility; Biard had to clamber 3 m up into trees to retrieve the youngsters from their nesting boxes. Rapidly developing a head for heights, Biard gave half of the chicks in each nest box a 0.50 ml dose of carotenoid-spiked sunflower oil, while the others were given untreated oil, repeating the supplement every two days until the youngsters fledged at 16 days of age. On the day before the chicks left home, Biard measured their weights and tarsus lengths, collected a 100 ml blood sample from a vein in the chick's wing and collected 6 yellow feathers from the breast to see whether the carotenoid boost had benefited them. She also checked how strong the chick's immune system was by injecting a small amount of antigen into the chick's wing, and measured the degree of inflammation 19 hours later.

Back in the Paris lab, Biard began analysing the blood samples to see if the carotenoid boost had improved the chick's health. But when she looked at the proportion of red and white blood cells in each sample there was no difference between the two sets of chicks. Checking the fledgling's feather colour with a spectrometer, Biard saw that the carotenoid-fed great tits' feathers were much brighter than those of unsupplemented great tits. However, the blue tits' plumage hadn't benefited from the carotenoid dietary supplement at all. And when she compared the degree of inflammation produced by the antigen injection, that was also unaffected by the extra carotenoids in the chicks' diet: carotenoids had not improved the youngsters' immune response. Teaming up with Peter Surai at the Avian Research Centre in the Scottish Agricultural College, Biard analysed the levels of antioxidants in the bird's blood and was surprised that the plasma carotenoid concentration was essentially the same in carotenoid supplemented chicks and chicks on a regular diet.

The only detectable benefit to the chick's condition that Biard found was that the smallest chicks on the carotenoid enhanced diet were heavier than equally sized unsupplemented chicks, giving the heavy guys a much greater chance of survival than their lighter nest-mates. `It seems that dietary availability of carotenoids may have important fitness consequences for tits' says Biard. `The picture is far more complicated than we initially thought' she adds.

References

Biard, C., Surai, P. F. and Møller, A. P. (2006). Carotenoid availability in diet and phenotype of blue and great tit nestlings. J. Exp. Biol. 209,1004 -1015.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Related articles in JEB:

Carotenoid availability in diet and phenotype of blue and great tit nestlings
Clotilde Biard, Peter F. Surai, and Anders P. Møller
JEB 2006 209: 1004-1015. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JEB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, K.