|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
First published online September 14, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 3337-3343 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.004473
Orientation towards prey in antlions: efficient use of wave propagation in sand
Université de Tours, IRBI UMR CNRS 6035, Parc Grandmont, 37200 Tours, France
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: arnold.fertin{at}etu.univ-tours.fr)
Accepted 19 July 2007
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: Antlion trap, sit-and-wait predation, vibratory perception, orientation, physics of sand, wave propagation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Antlion larvae are a good example of insects living in substrate, as they
spend their life buried in sand. They are found in dry and sandy habitats and
their larvae dig funnel-shaped pits to catch ants and other arthropods. The
pits are dug starting from a circular groove, the antlion throwing sand with
its mandibles. The antlion then gradually moves down spirally from the
perimeter towards the centre, making the pit deeper and deeper (Tuculescu et
al., 1987; Youthed and Moran,
1969
). The antlion is at the trap centre when construction is
complete, but may move away from the centre over time. The purpose of the
antlion trap is to direct prey towards the bottom of the trap
(Lucas, 1982
). When the prey
reaches the bottom of the pit, the antlion quickly closes its mandibles. This
trap seems simple, but it requires a slope steep enough to convey prey while
avoiding avalanches triggered by the inhabitant or by internal forces within
the sand (Fertin and Casas,
2006
). We have shown that antlions can construct pits with such an
optimal slope.
Antlions prevent prey from escaping up the walls of the trap by throwing
sand and attempting to bite them
(Napolitano, 1998
). Thus, the
antlion predation can be more active than sit-and-wait predation. However, an
active attack has higher energetic costs and much higher rebuilding costs as
the antlion must rebuild the pit. Thus, as it is important that an active
attack bring higher rewards, an antlion probably uses all available
information for orienting its attack. We propose that the antlion orients its
attack based on mechanical wave propagation through sand. Sand is made of
large conglomerations of discrete macroscopic particles. Sand and other
granular materials behave differently than the classic forms of solids,
liquids and gases. Sand is a surprising medium which sometimes behaves as a
liquid (avalanches) and sometimes behaves as a solid
(Duran, 2000
). Thus, it should
be considered as a state of matter in its own right, in particular regarding
mechanical wave propagation. Various animals use wave propagation in sand,
including moles, vipers, lizards and scorpions
(Brownell, 1977
;
Hetherington, 1992
;
Narins et al., 1997
;
Young and Morain, 2002
). This
study aimed to assess whether antlions use mechanical energy produced by
struggling prey that is transmitted through sand to determine the direction
and distance of prey. We also discuss the implications of sand properties in
terms of orientation mechanisms.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
![]() |
Behavioural bioassays
Second-stage larvae of Euroleon nostras Fourcroy (Neuroptera:
Myrmeleontidae) were collected in Tours (47°21'16.36''N,
0°42'16.08''E, France). They were fed each day with ants and
Drosophila. Thirty antlion larvae were placed in plastic boxes (10.6
cmx10.6 cmx6 cm) filled with Fontainebleau sand to a depth of 5 cm
the day before the experiment to allow them to dig their traps during the
night. The experiments were performed at controlled temperature, T
(25.8±0.5°C), and moisture, RH (36.1±4.2%; means ±
s.d.). The tip of the electromagnetic shaker was positioned carefully 10 mm
behind the head of the antlion lying in its pit. The trap slope was between
29.61° and 37.60° (Fertin and
Casas, 2006
). Placing the tip 10 mm behind the antlion head gives
a sand layer between 4.94 mm and 6.01 mm, similar to the sand layer used
previously. Thus, the tip of the electromagnetic shaker was initially out of
the reach of antlion mandibles. The stimulus simulating the walk of an ant was
then produced.
Antlion attack behaviour during stimulation was recorded on camera (Euromex VC3031, Arnhem, Holland). Each video sequence was analysed frame by frame to quantify the attack behaviour, which consisted of attempted bites and sand tossing. Attacks were considered successful if the antlion had moved towards the tip of the electromagnetic shaker and bitten it. The distance from head to tip was measured in the first and the last frame. This measurement was used to calculate antlion displacement during stimulation.
The direction of sand tossing was measured in the frame corresponding to the moment the sand was tossed. A frame obtained with an analog camera consists of two interlaced half-images separated by 0.02 s (PAL format). The first half-image contains the odd lines and the second contains the even lines. A delay between the capture of the two half-images induces a difference of contrast typical of a moving object, called interlacing. The following procedure aims at sharpening these small contrast differences. We propose here a simple image processing method to detect the areas with interlacing (i.e. moving areas) in a frame corresponding to sand flying (Fig. 2A).
|
![]() |
i,j is close to 0. A pixel
is therefore not interlaced if its grey value Pi,j is
close to the grey values of the upper pixel and the lower pixel. Third, the
contrast differences were simplified by applying the following binary
threshold:
![]() | (i) |
![]() | (ii) |
![]() | (iii) |
![]() | (iv) |
3). As antlions moved during
stimulation, we observed several angle values
1 even though
they were fixed at 90° at the start of the experiment. We took this
movement into account in our analysis. Fifty sand tossings were randomly
selected in the recording of 26 antlions (two sand tossings per individual on
average) and analysed. ImageJ (Abramoff et
al., 2004
|
Statistical analysis
Wilcoxon tests or Student's t-tests were used for statistical
analyses of the differences in variables. The choice between these two tests
was determined by the significance of the Shapiro–Wilk test for
normality and F test for homoscedasticity. We used linear models for
the correlation between certain variables, for which the significance of the
correlation was assessed by F tests. Student's t-tests were
used to analyse the significance of the parameters generated by these models.
Rayleigh tests (Batschelet,
1981
) were used to determine the significance of differences
between the mean of circular variables and the 0° direction. The 95%
confidence interval (CI; mean ± 95% CI) is indicated for all means and
estimates.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
A mean signal was obtained from the mean of 20 signals extracted from
electromagnetic shaker recordings as described above. Power spectral densities
of mean signals for the ant pattern and the electromagnetic shaker pattern
were very close, especially at the power peak (–19.75 dB at 1099 Hz for
the ant pattern and –18.79 dB at 1059 Hz for the electromagnetic shaker
pattern) (Fig. 5)
(Norton and Karczub, 2003
).
The spectrum of the electromagnetic shaker pattern had a second, smaller peak
at 4484 Hz, probably due to interference from the electromagnetic shaker or
the attached needle.
|
|
The angular precision of sand tossing (
3) was not
significantly different from 0 (mean: 0.87±4.76°, Rayleigh test,
N=50, r=0.9586, P<0.001)
(Fig. 7A). The angle of sand
tossing (
1) was a linear function of the angle of the
electromagnetic shaker tip (
2) (N=50,
R2=0.5669, F=62.82, P<0.001), with
near perfect correlation (Rayleigh test, N=50, r=0.9996,
P<0.001) (Fig. 7B).
Thus, antlions throw sand in the direction of the stimulus.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The sensory physiology of antlions in relation to prey capture is unknown
except for the work of Devetak (Devetak,
1985
), in which an antlion was stimulated to leave its pit in a
highly contrived manner. Euroleon nostras have six pairs of stemmata
with about 45 receptors and a lens aperture of 60 µm. The temporal and
spatial resolution of these stemmata are coarse (flicker fusion frequency=27
Hz, acceptance angle=8°, total receptor field=47°)
(Jockusch, 1967
;
Gilbert, 1994
;
Land and Nilson, 2002
). In our
experiments, the needle was fine (150 µm), and the time of needle movement
for each pulse was short (0.375 ms). Antlions reacted only when the needle was
set into vibratory motion. Therefore, vision was not involved in prey capture
in our study. Vision may possibly be used to supplement mechanical
information, e.g. about distance, in the presence of real prey.
The responses clearly show that antlions detect their prey through wave
propagation in sand. The use of sand as a transmission medium for mechanical
information has been studied with scorpions and crabs
(Aicher and Tautz, 1989
;
Brownell, 1977
; Browell and
Farley, 1979). Sand scorpions assess prey direction in the same sandy
environment with even better accuracy of orientation than antlions. Sand
scorpions have eight vibration receptors on tarsi. A neuronal model explains
how these sensors work (Brownell and van
Hemmen, 2001
; Stürzl et
al., 2000
). Various authors have claimed that scorpions use
Raleigh surface waves. However, antlions cannot use Rayleigh waves as easily
because they are totally immersed in sand. Measurements of Rayleigh waves
decay within sand will be necessary to clarify this point. They are
transmitted to some depth within the substrate and antlions live in a
subsurface layer.
Wave propagation within granular materials has been studied only recently
(Liu and Nagel, 1992
;
Somfai et al., 2005
) and even
more recently in sand (Bonneau et al.,
2007
). In a granular medium, waves travel along specific paths
determined by the geometrical arrangement of sand grains, which itself defines
a contact network between grains. Thus, Liu and Nagel showed that transmission
is dominated by strong spatial fluctuations of force networks
(Liu and Nagel, 1992
).
Consequently, the slightest temperature change induces major rearrangements of
forces and sometimes a great loss of transmission. This exceptional
sensitivity was shown by Liu and Nagel
(Liu and Nagel, 1993
). An
increase of 1°C in a glass bead decreases transmission of sound within a
layer of beads by 50%. Thus, wave propagation in sand, once considered at the
microscale of reception, is not understood, except that it entails a large
amount of stochasticity. The nearly perfect directional orientation of
antlions buried in sand is therefore most remarkable given the high degree of
unpredictability in the force networks within the medium. These two facts
imply that antlions integrate the information in waves produced by struggling
prey over many receptors distributed over a large portion of their body
surface. The exact nature of the waves they use for orientation is unknown, as
is our understanding of wave propagation in this unique animal
construction.
List of symbols and abbreviations
1
2
3
i,j
i,j'
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abramoff, M. D., Magelhaes, P. J. and Ram, S. J. (2004). Image processing with ImageJ. Biophoton. Int. 11,36 -42.
Aicher, B. and Tautz, J. (1989). Vibrational communication in the fiddler crab, Uca pugilator. J. Comp. Physiol. A 166,345 -353.
Batschelet, E. (1981). Circular Statistics in Biology. London: Academic Press.
Bonneau, L., Andreotti, B. and Clément, E. (2007). Surface elastic waves in granular media under gravity and their relation to booming avalanches. Phys. Rev. E 75, doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.75.016602 .
Brownell, P. H. (1977). Compressional and
surface waves in sand: used by desert scorpions to locate prey.
Science 197,497
-482.
Brownell, P. H. and Farley, R. D. (1979). Orientation to vibrations in sand by the nocturnal scorpion Paruroctonus mesaensis: mechanism of target localization. J. Comp. Physiol. A 131,31 -38.[CrossRef]
Brownell, P. H. and van Hemmen, J. L. (2001). Vibration sensitivity and a computational theory for prey-localizing behavior in sand scorpions. Am. Zool. 41,1229 -1240.[CrossRef]
Castellanos, I. and Barbosa, P. (2006). Evaluation of predation risk by a caterpillar using substrate-borne vibrations. Anim. Behav. 72,461 -469.[CrossRef]
Cocroft, R. B. and Rodriguez, R. (2005). The behavioral ecology of insect vibrational communication. BioScience 55,323 -334.[CrossRef]
Devetak, D. (1985). Detection of substrate vibrations in the antlion larva, Myrmeleon formicarius (Neuroptera: Myrmeleonidae). Bioloski Vestnik 33, 11-22.
Duran, J. (2000). Sands, Powders and Grains: An Introduction to the Physics of Granular Materials. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Elias, D. O., Mason, C. A. and Hoy, R. R.
(2004). The effect of substrate on the efficacy of seismic
courtship signal transmission in the jumping spider Habronattus
dossenus (Araneae: Salticidae). J. Exp. Biol.
207,4105
-4110.
Fertin, A. and Casas, J. (2006). Efficiency of
antlion trap construction. J. Exp. Biol.
209,3510
-3515.
Gilbert, C. (1994). Form and function of stemmata in larvae of holometabolous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39,323 -349.[CrossRef]
Greenfield, M. D. (2002). Signalers and Receivers: Mechanisms and Evolution of Arthropod Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hetherington, T. E. (1992). Behavioral uses of seismic cues by the sandswimming lizard Scincus scincus. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 4,5 -14.
Jockusch, B. (1967). Bau und Funktion eines larvalen Insektenauges. Untersuchungen am Ameisenl6wen (Euroleon nostras, Planipennia: Myrmeleontidae). Z. Vgl. Physiol. 56,171 -198.
Land, M. F. and Nilsson, D. E. (2002). Animal Eyes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lang, H. H. (1980). Surface wave discrimination between prey and non prey by the back swimmer Notonecta glauca L. (Hemiptera, Heteroptera). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 6, 233-246.[CrossRef]
Liu, C. H. and Nagel, S. R. (1992). Sound in sand. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68,2301 -2304.[CrossRef][Medline]
Liu, C. H. and Nagel, S. R. (1993). Sound in a granular material: disorder and nonlinearity. Phys. Rev. B 48,15646 -15650.[CrossRef]
Lucas, J. R. (1982). The biophysics of pit construction by antlion larvae. Anim. Behav. 30,651 -657.[CrossRef]
Markl, H. and Wiese, K. (1969). Die empfindlichkeit des rückenswimmers Notonecta glauca L. for oberflächenwellen des wassers. Z. Vgl. Physiol. 62,413 -420.[CrossRef]
Markl, H., Lang, H. and Wiese, K. (1973). Die genauigkeit der ortung eines wellenzentrums durch den rückenswimmer Notonecta glauca L. J. Comp. Physiol. A 86,359 -364.[CrossRef]
Mason, M. J. and Narins, P. M. (2001). Seismic signal use by fossorial mammals. Am. Zool. 41,1171 -1184.[CrossRef]
Murphey, R. K. (1971). Sensory aspects of the control of orientation to prey by the waterstrider, Gerris remigis.J. Comp. Physiol. A 72,168 -185.
Murphey, R. K. and Mendenhall, B. (1971). Localization of receptors controlling orientation to prey by the backswimmer Notonecta undulata. J. Comp. Physiol. A 84, 19-30.
Napolitano, J. F. (1998). Predatory behaviour of pit-making antlion, Myrmeleon mobilis (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae). Fla. Entomol. 81,562 -566.[CrossRef]
Narins, P. M., Lewis, E. R., Jarvis, J. J. U. M. and O'Riain, J. (1997). The use of seismic signals by fossorial southern African mammals: a neuroethological gold mine. Brain Res. Bull. 44,641 -646.[CrossRef][Medline]
Norton, M. P. and Karczub, D. G. (2003). Fundamentals Noise and Vibration Analysis for Engineers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Somfai, E., Roux, J. N., Snoeijer, J. H., van Hecke, M. and van Saarloos, W. (2005). Elastic wave propagation in confined granular systems. Phys. Rev. E 72, 021301.[CrossRef]
Stürzl, W., Kempter, R. and van Hemmen, J. L. (2000). Theory of arachnid prey localization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84,5668 -5671.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tuculescu, R., Topoff, H. and Wolfe, S. (1975). Mechanism of pit construction by antlion larvae. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 68,719 -720.
Young, B. A. and Morain, M. (2002). The use of
ground-borne vibrations for prey localization in the Saharan sand vipers
(Cerastes). J. Exp. Biol.
205,661
-665.
Youthed, G. J. and Moran, V. C. (1969). Pit construction by myrmeleontid larvae. J. Insect Physiol. 15,867 -875.[CrossRef]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||