QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online October 19, 2007
Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 3757-3762 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
doi: 10.1242/jeb.007690

This Article Summary Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Estrella, S. M. Articles by Masero, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Estrella, S. M. Articles by Masero, J. A.

The use of distal rhynchokinesis by birds feeding in water

Sora M. Estrella^1,* and José A. Masero²

¹ Centro Andaluz de Ciencias y Tecnologías Marinas, Universidad de Cádiz, E-11510, Puerto Real, Spain
² Grupo de Investigación en Conservación, Área de Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Extremadura, E-06071, Badajoz, Spain

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: sora.marin{at}uca.es)

Accepted 21 August 2007

	Summary

TOP Summary Introduction Materials and methods Results Discussion References

 
The use of distal rhynchokinesis, which consists of the movement of the distal part of the upper jaw with respect to the cranium, is well documented in long-billed shorebirds (Scolopacidae), commonly being associated with the deep probing feeding method. However, the functional and evolutionary significance of distal rhynchokinesis and other cranial kinesis is unclear. We report for the first time the use and occurrence of distal rhynchokinesis in wild long-billed shorebirds feeding on small prey items suspended in water. We tested whether prey size in captive dunlins Calidris alpina influences the occurrence of distal rhynchokinesis during feeding and also whether its use affects foraging efficiency. We found that wild dunlin, curlew sandpiper Calidris ferruginea, sanderling Calidris alba and little stint Calidris minuta commonly use distal rhynchokinesis to strike, capture and transport small prey items. Prey size influenced the occurrence of distal rhynchokinesis during the transport phase, with this type of cranial kinesis being more frequently used with larger prey. The rhynchokinesis protraction angle (a measure of bill tip elevation) during prey strike and transport was affected by prey size, and bill gape was modulated through the use of distal rhynchokinesis in relation to prey size. Finally, the use of distal rhynchokinesis throughout intra-oral prey transport was related to shorter transport times, which improved foraging efficiency. We conclude that distal rhynchokinesis is a mechanism that could contribute to the flexible feeding behaviour of long-distance migratory shorebirds, enhancing small prey profitability and so improving foraging efficiency, and may have played a role in the evolutionary radiation of Scolopacidae (Charadrii).

Key words: distal rhynchokinesis, shorebirds, water, foraging, feeding behaviour

	Introduction

TOP Summary Introduction Materials and methods Results Discussion References

 
The mechanical sophistication of the jaw apparatus in birds is highly developed (Bühler, 1981). All modern birds can move the upper jaw, or a part of it, with respect to the cranium, i.e. they present cranial kinesis (Zusi, 1984), which is an important characteristic in the feeding behaviour of birds (Bock, 1964; Gussekloo and Bout, 2005a). Cranial kinesis is achieved in part through the bending zones (thin bone) distributed in the bird's jaw apparatus [see description of the mechanics in Gussekloo et al. (Gussekloo et al., 2001) and Gussekloo and Bout (Gussekloo and Bout, 2005a)]. Three general kinds of cranial kinesis have been described in birds: prokinesis, amphikinesis and rhynchokinesis [see Bock (Bock, 1964) and Zusi (Zusi, 1984) for detailed descriptions]. Rhynchokinesis is known to exist in Charadriiformes, Gruiformes, Columbiformes, Struthioformes, Trochilidae, Threskiornithidae, and in some Passeriformes (for reviews, see Bühler, 1981; Zusi, 1984).

In rhynchokinetic birds, the dorsal flexion zone of the upper jaw is displaced more or less rostrally along the dorsal bar of the upper jaw [see Fig. 1 (Zusi, 1984)]. Five types of rhynchokinesis can be distinguished according to the position of the bending zone in the dorsal bar of the upper jaw: (i) proximal rhynchokinesis (the bending zone is in the base of the dorsal bar); (ii) central rhynchokinesis (there is a large bending zone in the central area of the upper jaw); (iii) extensive or elongated rhynchokinesis (an extended bending zone is located along the dorsal bar); (iv) double rhynchokinesis (for which there are two hinges on the dorsal bar); and (v) distal rhynchokinesis (the bending area is in the distal part of the dorsal bar) (Bühler, 1981; Gussekloo and Bout, 2005a; Gussekloo and Bout, 2005b; Zusi, 1984).

View larger version (4K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. (A) Schematic drawing of the rhynchokinesis protraction angle () and bill gape (G). (B) Schematic drawing describing the measurement method for the rhynchokinesis protraction angle. The angle vertex (torsion area) is indicated by an arrow.

Many long-billed shorebirds (Scolopacidae) are known to feed by probing in the mud or sand to capture benthic macroinvertebrates. Distal rhynchokinesis in these species has commonly been associated with the deep probing feeding method, where it has been hypothesised to reduce the force needed to open the bill (Zweers and Gerritsen, 1997), as well as improving the grip on food items within the substratum (Burton, 1974; Zusi, 1984; Zweers and Gerritsen, 1997).

Most hypotheses regarding the function and benefits of rhynchokinesis are scarcely substantiated by direct observations (for reviews, see Bout and Zweers, 2001; Gussekloo and Bout, 2005a; Gussekloo and Bout, 2005b), and field and experimental analyses of distal rhynchokinesis with respect to feeding behaviour are lacking. For example, although many long-billed shorebirds commonly also feed in the water column (Cramp and Simmons, 1983; Piersma et al., 1996), to the best of our knowledge, no published data on the use of distal rhynchokinesis in shorebirds feeding on prey items suspended in water exist.

In this study we report for the first time the use and occurrence of distal rhynchokinesis in wild long-billed shorebirds feeding on small prey items suspended in water. We experimentally tested in the laboratory whether the occurrence of distal rhynchokinesis during feeding was affected by prey size, and whether these birds varied the protraction or upward angle in relation to prey size. In accordance with Zusi (Zusi, 1984), we predicted that the protraction of the bill tip during the strike and transport phases would be greater with larger sized prey. Finally, we tested whether the use of distal rhynchokinesis affected the intra-oral prey transport times in captive dunlins, which would in turn affect their foraging efficiency.

	Materials and methods

TOP Summary Introduction Materials and methods Results Discussion References

 
Field data collection
During spring and summer periods from 2002 to 2004, random long-distance migratory shorebirds of the species curlew sandpiper (Calidris ferruginea L., N=22), dunlin (Calidris alpina L., N=19), sanderling (Calidris alba L., N=16) and little stint (Calidris minuta L., N=13) were filmed during daylight (between 09:00 and 12:00 h GMT) feeding actively at high rates (38–102 prey items min^–1) in the water column of hypersaline pans in south western Spain [see Masero (Masero, 2003) for details regarding the study area], from a vehicle and at a distance of less than 30 m. Each individual was recorded for periods ranging from 30 to 60 s at 25 frames s^–1 using a JVC digital video camera (JVC GR-DVL145EG optical zoom x16, Victory Company of Japan, Ltd, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan).

Field film analysis
The video camera was capable of de-interlacing each frame in two, resulting in 50 images s^–1. Viewing the sequences frame by frame allowed us to describe the use and examine the occurrence of distal rhynchokinesis in wild birds feeding on small prey items (mainly the crustacean brine shrimp Artemia spp.) suspended in the water column. We considered that distal rhynchokinesis was being employed during the feeding process (prey strike, capture and transport) when the distal part (tip) of the upper jaw was elevated or depressed independently of the rest of the upper jaw.

Laboratory experiment
Four dunlins were captured in Cádiz Bay Natural Park in November 2003, and maintained in captivity in a 1.80 mx0.92 mx0.92 m indoor aviary. Fresh and saline water, brine shrimps and living fly larvae were offered ad libitum for bathing, drinking and feeding. Dunlins were weighed regularly, and no significant weight loss was found in any bird throughout the experiment.

The experimental prey was brine shrimp, a naturally occurring and common aquatic prey of shorebirds (Masero, 2003; Sánchez et al., 2006; Verkuil et al., 2003). We placed a large amount of live brine shrimps into a plastic tray with hypersaline water, and many of them were sorted visually by hand into four size classes. Randomly, individuals from each size class were set aside in order to accurately determine the mean body length (±s.d.) of brine shrimps under a binocular microscope equipped with an ocular micrometer. Mean values were: size class 1, 4.10±0.52 mm (range: 3.50–4.99 mm; N=12); size class 2, 5.34±0.04 mm (range: 5.32–5.40 mm; N=14), size class 3, 6.85±0.35 mm (range: 6.00–7.00 mm; N=8); and size class 4, 8.89±0.46 mm (range: 7.98–9.50 mm; N=10).

Trials were carried out in a 0.90 mx0.30 mx0.40 m cage, which was completely closed off so as to avoid birds being disturbed by researchers in the vicinity of the cage. A light source simulating natural light was situated in the ceiling of the cage. All the trials were carried out in the afternoon, from 16:00 h. In order to encourage the birds to feed during the trials, food was removed around 11:00 h [see van Gils et al. (van Gils et al., 2003) for similar procedure]. Before birds were placed in the experimental cage, they were held in dark boxes for an hour to recover from capture stress [see similar procedure in Piersma et al. (Piersma et al., 2003)]. Between 15 and 20 live brine shrimps of each class size were offered randomly to the experimental individuals in a 71.6 cm² Petri dish (0.5 cm deep water) placed in the cage. Water salinity and temperature were kept as near as possible to constant (salinity: 36; mean temperature: 18.7±0.93°C).

Captive birds were recorded with the digital video camera mentioned previously. The Petri dish was situated in front of the video camera lens positioned in an opening made in the cage. The area where the Petri dish was located had a white background in order to make the bill more easily visible. We only analysed the sequences where a lateral view of the bird was clear and the bill was perpendicular to the camera.

Captivity film analysis
During the prey strike and transport phases, the maximum rhynchokinesis protraction angle was measured, taking the dorsal line of the upper jaw as the reference line (Fig. 1A). The protraction angle was calculated as the obtuse angle made between the distal part of the upper jaw and the dorsal part of the rest of the upper jaw structure (Fig. 1B). Therefore, the smaller the angle, the greater the protraction of the bill tip. The angle vertex was situated in the torsion area (Fig. 1B). Maximum bill gape was defined as the maximum distance between bill tips (Fig. 1A).

The extraction of digital images from videotape to PC was made with the program Pinnacle Studio 8.12 (Pinnacle Systems Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA 1998–2003). Rhynchokinesis protraction angle and bill gape measurements were determined with the program Corel Draw 10 (Corel Corporation, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 2000). The calibration of bill gape was carried out using the bill length (culmen) of each individual (Podos et al., 2004).

The effect of the use of distal rhynchokinesis in the prey transport phase was evaluated through the kinematic variable `time of transport' for the trial size class 3. This size class (0.30–0.40 mg ash-free dry mass) is within the size range for brine shrimps commonly captured by wild shorebirds (Masero and Pérez-Hurtado, 2001; Verkuil et al., 2003). Video films were analysed frame by frame and the use (`yes' or `no') of distal rhynchokinesis during prey transport and the duration of transport were noted. The intra-oral prey transport began when the prey was held in the tips of the bill out of the water and was completed when the prey was swallowed with the bill closed. All dunlins used a feeding mechanism termed surface tension transport (STT), which relies on the use of the surface tension of a drop of water to convey a single prey contained in it from bill tip to mouth (Estrella et al., 2007; Rubega and Obst, 1993; Rubega, 1997). Although the prey transport time using STT is very small, by making use of the time elapsed between images (0.02 s), calculation of the duration of prey transport from bill tip to mouth is possible (Estrella et al., 2007).

A repeated measurement analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) in a general linear model (GLM) procedure was used to test the influence of prey size on the occurrence of rhynchokinesis during the feeding process and on the maximum protraction angle. For the latter, we analysed protraction angle as a function of class prey size and phase (strike or transport), including the interaction term `class prey size x phase'. Student's t-test for dependent samples was conducted to investigate the influence of the use of distal rhynchokinesis on the time of prey transport. Before conducting statistical analyses, occurrence frequencies were arcsine transformed to acquire normality. A mixed linear model was performed to examine the relationship between rhynchokinesis protraction angle and bill gape during prey strike and intra-oral prey transport. In this model, individual identification was entered as a random factor, protraction angle as a covariate and phase (strike or transport) as a fixed factor. To test whether the slopes of the regression lines differed between the two phases, we included the interaction term `protraction angle x phase' in the model. We considered between two and ten prey captures for each of the four birds filmed foraging on four different classes of prey size. Measurements of maximum protraction angle and bill gape in the transport phase from two individuals of the trial prey size classes 1 and 2, and in the strike phase from one individual of trial prey size class 3 were not obtained because the images were not of high enough quality to measure the protraction angle of distal rhynchokinesis. P values 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using Statistica 7.0 (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA 2004).

	Results

TOP Summary Introduction Materials and methods Results Discussion References

 
Use and occurrence of distal rhynchokinesis in shorebirds feeding in water
All wild shorebird species filmed used distal rhynchokinesis during the feeding process (Fig. 2). When shorebirds attacked prey located in the upper layers of the water, it was possible to observe that only the distal part of the upper jaw was elevated (Fig. 3A). If the prey was captured using distal rhynchokinesis, the distal part of the upper jaw was depressed, and the prey was gripped in the bill tip (Fig. 3B). During the prey transport event, the use of distal rhynchokinesis was indicated by the elevation of the upper jaw tip (Fig. 3C).

View larger version (10K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Observed occurrence (mean ± s.e.m.) of the use of distal rhynchokinesis in curlew sandpiper (CS), dunlin (Dun), sanderling (San) and little stint (LS) feeding on small prey suspended in the water column in the field during prey strike, capture and transport.

View larger version (27K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Digital images showing the use of distal rhynchokinesis during the strike of a prey suspended in the water column (A) and in the transport of a small prey by a Sanderling in the field (C). (B) Use of distal rhynchokinesis to grip a prey in the water column by a dunlin in the laboratory (B). A digital image of a captive dunlin with its bill in the resting position is shown for comparison (D).

In captive dunlins, distal rhynchokinesis was used in 91.6±13.3% (N=110), 42.1±32.1% (N=105) and 76.1±24.4% (N=109) of prey strike, transport and capture events, respectively, following a similar pattern to that in wild birds. The occurrence of distal rhynchokinesis during the strike and capture phases was not affected by prey size (RM-ANOVA, strike: F_3,9=1.35, P=0.31; capture: F_3,9=2.74, P=0.10). However, prey size affected the occurrence of distal rhynchokinesis during the transport phase (RM-ANOVA, F_3,9=18.31, P<0.001; Fig. 4), rhynchokinesis being used more often when prey were larger.

View larger version (4K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Observed occurrence (mean ± s.e.m.) of the use of distal rhynchokinesis in prey transport by dunlins in the laboratory. Values with different letters are significantly different (Tukey's test).

View larger version (9K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. (A) Effect of prey size and phase (strike or transport) on the rhynchokinesis protraction angle (mean ± s.e.m.). Values with different letters are significantly different (Tukey's test). (B) Relationship between bill gape (mean ± s.e.m.) and rhynchokinesis protraction angle. Filled circles represent prey strike and open squares represent prey transport.

Use of distal rhynchokinesis and duration of prey transport
The use of distal rhynchokinesis during prey transport affected the duration of transport, this being significantly shorter when birds used distal rhynchokinesis (t-test, t_1,3=3.48, P<0.05; Fig. 6).

View larger version (4K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Effect of the use of distal rhynchokinesis on the intra-oral transport time (mean ± s.e.m.) when small prey items are transported using surface tension transport (STT).

	Discussion

TOP Summary Introduction Materials and methods Results Discussion References

Viscosity and drag forces in the aquatic medium are distinct from those encountered in the terrestrial medium (Vogel, 1994). The use of distal rhynchokinesis by long-billed shorebirds feeding on small prey items suspended in water may be related to economy of movement, as Bout and Zweers (Bout and Zweers, 2001) suggest in reference to upper jaw kinesis in birds. To feed profitably on small prey items, shorebirds must capture and handle them at high rates (e.g. Verkuil et al., 2003; Zwarts and Wanink, 1993), so mechanisms that reduce capture and handling time of small prey items enhance small prey profitability. When a shorebird's bill penetrates the water with the entire jaw open, the resistance must be greater than that encountered when only the distal part of the upper jaw is elevated. Therefore, long-billed shorebird species that use distal rhynchokinesis are theoretically able to take advantage of this reduced resistance and strike a prey item suspended in water faster. In the same way, distal rhynchokinesis may minimise the volume of water required to displace the small prey items suspended in water. Accordingly, distal rhynchokinesis is thought to contribute to enhancing small prey profitability.

Small-sized Sandpipers feeding on small prey items suspended in the water column use the STT mechanism (Estrella et al., 2007; Masero, 2002; Rubega, 1997), which allows them to feed profitably on small prey (Estrella et al., 2007). A characteristic of STT is the presence of jaw spreading to produce an increase in the free surface area of the drop of water (Rubega and Obst, 1993). The increased occurrence of distal rhynchokinesis during the transport of large prey suggests that this type of cranial kinesis contributes to achieving the greater bill gapes required to transport them using STT (J.A.M. and S.M.E., unpublished observations), this being shown by the fact that bill tip elevation increased with prey size.

In shorebirds feeding on small prey items, prey transport time approximates total handling time, since killing or cleaning prey is not necessary (Zwarts and Wanink, 1993). Also, at high prey densities, search time approaches zero, so the handling time can be considered as the inverse of pecking rate (see Zwarts and Wanink, 1993). Since the use of distal rhynchokinesis in birds using STT was related to a diminution of the transport time, the use of distal rhynchokinesis may enhance feeding efficiency in shorebirds using STT.

As indicated, distal rhynchokinesis has commonly been related to the probing technique used by long-billed shorebirds when feeding on prey buried in the substratum. It is probably also used by long-billed shorebirds as they peck prey from the substratum surface. In these situations the use of distal rhynchokinesis may save time in capturing through the adjustment of bill gape to prey size, as has been hypothesised in Clark's nutcrackers Nucifraga columbiana (Möller et al., 2001). Moreover, if during pecking or probing the conditions for using STT are met (small prey and substratum with a layer of water or with enough interstitial water to generate a drop of water to transport the prey), the simultaneous use of distal rhynchokinesis and STT may reduce the prey transport time of birds combining the two foraging mechanisms. Therefore, the use of distal rhynchokinesis may also enhance feeding efficiency in terrestrial conditions.

Rubega (Rubega, 1997) postulated that STT may have played a role in the evolutionary radiation of Scolopacidae (a shorebird family with many species equipped with long and needle-shaped bills), allowing them to exploit different types of habitat dominated by small prey items suspended in water, which are unprofitable to other groups of shorebirds. If this hypothesis is true, distal rhynchokinesis may also have contributed to this radiation, enabling shorebirds to exploit small prey items buried in the substratum or suspended in the water column.

	Acknowledgments

 
We are indebted to Macarena Castro for sharing her videotaped field sequences. Thomas Ransome made helpful comments on the first draft of the manuscript. We also thank G. A. Gudmundsson, H. Hoppeler and three anonymous referees for their helpful comments on the manuscript.

	References

TOP Summary Introduction Materials and methods Results Discussion References

 

Bock, W. J. (1964). Kinetics of the avian skull. J. Morphol. 114,1 -42.[CrossRef]

Bout, R. G. and Zweers, G. A. (2001). The role of cranial kinesis in birds. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 131A,197 -205.

Bühler, P. (1981). Functional anatomy of the avian jaw apparatus. In Form and Function in Birds. Vol. 2 (ed. A. S. King and J. McLelland), pp. 439-468. London: Academic Press.

Burton, P. J. K. (1974). Feeding and the Feeding Apparatus in Waders: A Study on Anatomy and Adaptations in the Charadrii. London: Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History).

Cramp, S. and Simmons, K. E. L. (1983). Waders to Gulls: Handbook of the Birds of Europe the Middle East and North Africa. The Birds of the Western Palearctic, Vol.3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Elner, R. W. and Seaman, D. A. (2003). Calidrid conservation: unrequited needs. Wader Study Group Bull. 100,30 -34.

Estrella, S. M., Masero, J. A. and Pérez-Hurtado, A. (2007). Small prey profitability: field analysis of shorebirds' use of surface tension of water to transport prey. Auk 124, In press.

Gussekloo, S. W. S. and Bout, R. G. (2005a). The kinematics of feeding and drinking in paleognathous birds in relation to cranial morphology. J. Exp. Biol. 208,3395 -3407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gussekloo, S. W. S. and Bout, R. G. (2005b). Cranial kinesis in paleognathous birds. J. Exp. Biol. 208,3409 -3419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gussekloo, S. W. S., Vosselman, M. G. and Bout, R. G. (2001). Threedimensional kinematics of skeletal elements in avian prokinetic and rhynchokinetic skulls determined by roentgen stereophotogrammetry. J. Exp. Biol. 204,1735 -1744.[Abstract]

Masero, J. A. (2002). Why don't Red Knots Calidris canutus feed extensively on the crustacean Artemia? Bird Study 49,304 -306.

Masero, J. A. (2003). Assessing alternative anthropogenic habitats for conserving waterbirds: salinas as buffer areas against the impact of natural habitat loss for shorebirds. Biodivers. Conserv. 12,1157 -1173.[CrossRef]

Masero, J. A. and Pérez-Hurtado, A. (2001). Importance of the supratidal habitats for maintaining overwintering shorebird populations: how Redshanks use tidal mudflats and adjacent saltworks in southern Europe. Condor 103, 21-30.

Mathot, K. J. and Elner, R. W. (2004). Evidence for sexual partitioning of foraging mode in Western Sandpipers (Calidris mauri) during migration. Can. J. Zool. 82,1035 -1042.

Möller, A., Pavlick, B., Hile, A. G. and Balda, R. P. (2001). Clark's Nutcrackers Nucifraga columbiana remember the size of their cached seeds. Ethology 107,451 -461.[CrossRef]

Nuijens, F. W. and Bout, R. G. (1998). The role of two jaw ligaments in the evolution of passerines. Zoology 101,24 -33.

Piersma, T., Van Gils, J. and Wiersma, P. (1996). Family Scolopacidae (sandpipers, snipes and phalaropes). In Hoatzin to Auks: Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 3 (ed. J. Del Hoyo, A. Elliott and J. Sargatal), pp. 444-533. Barcelona: Lynx Editions.

Piersma, T., Dekinga, A., van Gils, J. A., Achterkamp, B. and Visser, G. H. (2003). Cost–benefit analysis of mollusc eating in a shorebird. I. Foraging and processing costs estimated by the doubly labelled water method. J. Exp. Biol. 206,3361 -3368.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Podos, J., Southall, J. A. and Rossi-Santos, M. R. (2004). Vocal mechanics in Darwin's finches: correlation of beak gape and song frequency. J. Exp. Biol. 207,607 -619.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rubega, M. A. (1997). Surface tension prey transport in shorebirds: how widespread is it? Ibis 139,488 -493.

Rubega, M. A. and Obst, B. S. (1993). Surface-tension feeding in Phalaropes: discovery of a novel feeding mechanism. Auk 110,169 -178.

Sánchez, M. I., Green, A. J. and Castellanos, E. M. (2006). Spatial and temporal fluctuations in presence and use of chironomid prey by shorebirds in the Odiel saltpans, south-west Spain. Hydrobiologia 567,329 -340.[CrossRef]

Skagen, S. K. and Oman, D. (1996). Dietary flexibility of shorebirds in the Western Hemisphere. Can. Field Nat. 110,419 -444.

van Gils, J. A., Piersma, T., Dekinga, A. and Dietz, M. W. (2003). Cost–benefit analysis of mollusc-eating in a shorebird II. Optimizing gizzard size in the face of seasonal demands. J. Exp. Biol. 206,3369 -3380.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Verkuil, Y., van der Have, T. M., van der Winden, J. and Chernichko, I. I. (2003). Habitat use and diet selection of northward migrating waders in the Sivash (Ukraine): the use of Brine shrimp Artemia salina in a variably saline lagoon complex. Ardea 91,71 -83.

Vogel, S. (1994). Life in Moving Fluids: The Physical Biology of Flow (2nd edn). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Zwarts, L. and Wanink, J. H. (1993). How the food supply harvestable by waders in the Wadden Sea depends on the variation in energy density, body weight, biomass, burying depth and behaviour of tidal-flat invertebrates. Neth. J. Sea Res. 31,441 -476.[CrossRef]

Zweers, G. A. and Gerritsen, A. F. C. (1997). Transitions from pecking to probing mechanisms in waders. Neth. J. Zool. 47,161 -208.

Zusi, R. L. (1984). A Functional and Evolutionary Analysis of Rhynchokinesis in Birds (Contributions to Zoology Number 395). Washington: Smithsonian Institute.

Related articles in JEB:

BENDY BEAKS

Laura Blackburn
JEB 2007 210: iii. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Prakash, D. Quere, and J. W. M. Bush Surface Tension Transport of Prey by Feeding Shorebirds: The Capillary Ratchet Science, May 16, 2008; 320(5878): 931 - 934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Blackburn BENDY BEAKS J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2007; 210(21): iii - iii. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Summary Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JEB Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Estrella, S. M. Articles by Masero, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Estrella, S. M. Articles by Masero, J. A.