(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Click on image to view larger version.

Fig. 6. (A) Representative electrophysiological recordings from RPeD1 in
semi-intact preparations taken after intact snails were exposed to PW (top),
CE (middle) or BC (bottom) treatments. All traces demonstrate spontaneous
firing activity, and bursting activity. (B) Summary data for mean
(±s.e.m.) spiking activity per 10 min (square-root transformed;
N=14). Results for CE (3.63±0.93) are significantly lower
(**P<0.01, N=14) than those for either PW
(8.17±1.40) or BC (5.94±1.20), which were not significantly
different from each other (one-way ANOVA). (C) Mean (±s.e.m.) number of
spikes per burst. Again, results for CE (2.14±0.62) were significantly
lower (**P<0.01, N=14) than those for either
PW (8.91±2.49) or BC (8.69±3.65), which were not significantly
different from each other (one-way ANOVA).